» Articles » PMID: 26512604

Comparison Between the Use of Ropivacaine Alone and Ropivacaine With Sufentanil in Epidural Labor Analgesia

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Oct 30
PMID 26512604
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of the sole local anesthetic ropivacaine with the combination of both local anesthetic ropivacaine and opioidergic analgesic sufentanil given epidurally on the labor pain control.After institutional review board approval and patient consent, a total of 500 nulliparas requesting epidural labor analgesia were enrolled and 481 eventually were randomized into 2 groups: a sole local anesthetic group (ropivacaine 0.125%) and a combination of local anesthetic and opioidergic analgesic group (0.125% ropivacaine + 0.3 μg/mL sufentanil). After the test dose, a 10-mL epidural analgesic solution was given in a single bolus, followed by intermittent bolus injection of 10 to 15 mL of the solution. The primary outcome was the analgesic efficacy measured using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain. Other maternal and infant variables were evaluated as secondary outcomes.A total of 346 participants completed the study. The median NRS pain score during the 1st stage of labor was significantly lower in the combination group 2.2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.8-2.7) comparing to the sole local analgesic group 2.4 (IQR: 2.0-2.8) (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in NRS pain score prior epidural analgesia and during the 2nd stage of labor. Patients in both groups rated same satisfaction of analgesia. Patients in the sole local analgesic group experienced fewer side effects than those in the combination group (37.7% vs 47.2%, P = 0.082). The individual analgesia-related cost in the sole local analgesic group was less ($5.7 ± 2.06) than that in the combination group ($9.76 ± 3.54) (P < 0.0001). The incidence of 1-minute Apgar ≤ 7 was lower in the sole local analgesic group 2 (1.2%) than the combination group 10 (5.5%) (P = 0.038). No difference was found between other secondary outcomes.The sole local anesthetic ropivacaine produces a comparable labor analgesic effect as the combination of both local anesthetic ropivacaine and opioidergic analgesic sufentanil at different stages of labor (ΔNRS = 0.2) but the former has less side effects, lower cost, and less incidence of lower 1-minute Apgar scoring. These results imply the necessity of a systematic reevaluation of epidural labor analgesia with sole local anesthetics against combination regimens of local anesthetics and other opioids.

Citing Articles

The 90% effective concentration of alfentanil combined with 0.075% ropivacaine for epidural labor analgesia: a single-center, prospective, double-blind sequential allocation biased-coin design.

Jia C, Zou B, Sun Y, Han B, Diao Y, Li Y J Anesth. 2024; 38(3):377-385.

PMID: 38441686 PMC: 11096240. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-024-03322-8.


Effects of 0.15% ropivacaine alone and combination with sufentanil on epidural labor analgesia and adverse reactions.

Zhong H, Wang Y, Wang Y, Li H Afr Health Sci. 2024; 23(3):569-575.

PMID: 38357150 PMC: 10862613. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v23i3.66.


Clinical effect of different concentrations of ropivacaine in the labor analgesia of dural puncture epidural technique for obese puerperae.

Shi L, Zhang D, Ye P, Peng W, Yin Y, Zhang Y Perioper Med (Lond). 2024; 13(1):7.

PMID: 38355657 PMC: 10868062. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-024-00363-1.


Comparisons of nonpharmaceutical analgesia and pharmaceutical analgesia on the labor analgesia effect of parturient women.

Zhu R, Pan Q, Cao X Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023; 11(7):e869.

PMID: 37506154 PMC: 10336482. DOI: 10.1002/iid3.869.


Interventions for the prevention or treatment of epidural-related maternal fever: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cartledge A, Hind D, Bradburn M, Martyn-St James M, Davenport S, Tung W Br J Anaesth. 2022; 129(4):567-580.

PMID: 35934529 PMC: 9575042. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.06.022.


References
1.
Breivik H, Borchgrevink P, Allen S, Rosseland L, Romundstad L, Hals E . Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 101(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aen103. View

2.
Cicarelli D, Silva R, Frerichs E, Pagnocca M . [Combined spinal-epidural for labor analgesia: does the addition of sufentanil to the local anesthetic influence apgar scores of the newborns?]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009; 57(3):272-9. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-70942007000300005. View

3.
Wong C . Advances in labor analgesia. Int J Womens Health. 2010; 1:139-54. PMC: 2971706. DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s4553. View

4.
Wang F, Shen X, Guo X, Peng Y, Gu X . Epidural analgesia in the latent phase of labor and the risk of cesarean delivery: a five-year randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111(4):871-80. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b55e65. View

5.
Bodian C, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft J, Beilin Y . The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001; 95(6):1356-61. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013. View