» Articles » PMID: 25386749

Intravenous Remifentanil Versus Epidural Ropivacaine with Sufentanil for Labour Analgesia: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Nov 12
PMID 25386749
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Remifentanil with appropriate pharmacological properties seems to be an ideal alternative to epidural analgesia during labour. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of remifentanil intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) compared with epidural analgesia. Medical records of 370 primiparas who received remifentanil IVPCA or epidural analgesia were reviewed. Pain and sedation scores, overall satisfaction, the extent of pain control, maternal side effects and neonatal outcome as primary observational indicators were collected. There was a significant decline of pain scores in both groups. Pain reduction was greater in the epidural group throughout the whole study period (0 ∼ 180 min) (P < 0.0001), and pain scores in the remifentanil group showed an increasing trend one hour later. The remifentanil group had a lower SpO2 (P < 0.0001) and a higher sedation score (P < 0.0001) within 30 min after treatment. The epidural group had a higher overall satisfaction score (3.8 ± 0.4 vs. 3.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.007) and pain relief score (2.9 ± 0.3 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4, P < 0.0001) compared with the remifentanil group. There was no significant difference on side effects between the two groups, except that a higher rate of dizziness (1% vs. 21.8%, P < 0.0001) was observed during remifentanil analgesia. And logistic regression analysis demonstrated that nausea, vomiting were associated with oxytocin usage and instrumental delivery, and dizziness was associated to the type and duration of analgesia. Neonatal outcomes such as Apgar scores and umbilical-cord blood gas analysis were within the normal range, but umbilical pH and base excess of neonatus in the remifentanil group were significantly lower. Remifentanil IVPCA provides poorer efficacy on labor analgesia than epidural analgesia, with more sedation on parturients and a trend of newborn acidosis. Despite these adverse effects, remifentanil IVPCA can still be an alternative option for labor analgesia under the condition of one-to-one bedside care, continuous monitoring, oxygen supply and preparation for neonatal resuscitation.

Citing Articles

Effect of ropivacaine and sufentanil in epidural labor analgesia.

Wen X, Huang B, Liang X Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(6):7001-7007.

PMID: 34306455 PMC: 8290753.


Effects of Ropivacaine in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia on Uterine Electromyographic Activities during Labor.

Qian X, Wang Q, Ou X, Li P, Zhao B, Liu H Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:7162865.

PMID: 30533438 PMC: 6247703. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7162865.


Comparison Between the Use of Ropivacaine Alone and Ropivacaine With Sufentanil in Epidural Labor Analgesia.

Wang X, Xu S, Qin X, Li X, Feng S, Liu Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(43):e1882.

PMID: 26512604 PMC: 4985418. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001882.

References
1.
Liu Z, Chen X, Li H, Qiu M, Duan T . A comparison of remifentanil parturient-controlled intravenous analgesia with epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2014; 118(3):598-603. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000077. View

2.
Evron S, Ezri T, Protianov M, Muzikant G, Sadan O, Herman A . The effects of remifentanil or acetaminophen with epidural ropivacaine on body temperature during labor. J Anesth. 2008; 22(2):105-11. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-007-0589-8. View

3.
Dhileepan S, Stacey R . A preliminary investigation of remifentanil as a labor analgesic. Anesth Analg. 2001; 92(5):1358-9. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200105000-00062. View

4.
Ismail M, Hassanin M . Neuraxial analgesia versus intravenous remifentanil for pain relief in early labor in nulliparous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 286(6):1375-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2459-3. View

5.
Landau R, Cahana A, Smiley R, Antonarakis S, Blouin J . Genetic variability of mu-opioid receptor in an obstetric population. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100(4):1030-3. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200404000-00042. View