» Articles » PMID: 26494944

Melodic Contour Training and Its Effect on Speech in Noise, Consonant Discrimination, and Prosody Perception for Cochlear Implant Recipients

Overview
Journal Behav Neurol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2015 Oct 24
PMID 26494944
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) recipients generally have good perception of speech in quiet environments but difficulty perceiving speech in noisy conditions, reduced sensitivity to speech prosody, and difficulty appreciating music. Auditory training has been proposed as a method of improving speech perception for CI recipients, and recent efforts have focussed on the potential benefits of music-based training. This study evaluated two melodic contour training programs and their relative efficacy as measured on a number of speech perception tasks. These melodic contours were simple 5-note sequences formed into 9 contour patterns, such as "rising" or "rising-falling." One training program controlled difficulty by manipulating interval sizes, the other by note durations. Sixteen adult CI recipients (aged 26-86 years) and twelve normal hearing (NH) adult listeners (aged 21-42 years) were tested on a speech perception battery at baseline and then after 6 weeks of melodic contour training. Results indicated that there were some benefits for speech perception tasks for CI recipients after melodic contour training. Specifically, consonant perception in quiet and question/statement prosody was improved. In comparison, NH listeners performed at ceiling for these tasks. There was no significant difference between the posttraining results for either training program, suggesting that both conferred benefits for training CI recipients to better perceive speech.

Citing Articles

Continuous monitoring of temporal skills during long-term in-home training by cochlear implant users.

Szymanski K, Gawryluk K, Brancewicz M Heliyon. 2025; 11(3):e41817.

PMID: 39975818 PMC: 11835561. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41817.


Speech-in-noise, psychosocial, and heart rate variability outcomes of group singing or audiobook club interventions for older adults with unaddressed hearing loss: A SingWell Project multisite, randomized controlled trial, registered report protocol.

Lo C, Rich Zendel B, Baskent D, Boyle C, Coffey E, Gagne N PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0314473.

PMID: 39630812 PMC: 11616889. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314473.


Using Machine Learning and Multifaceted Preoperative Measures to Predict Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Patro A, Lawrence P, Tamati T, Ning X, Moberly A Ear Hear. 2024; .

PMID: 39238093 PMC: 11825478. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001593.


Can Music Enhance Working Memory and Speech in Noise Perception in Cochlear Implant Users? Design Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study.

Mertel K, Dimitrijevic A, Thaut M Audiol Res. 2024; 14(4):611-624.

PMID: 39051196 PMC: 11270222. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres14040052.


Meta-Analysis Exploring the Effects of Music Training in Cochlear Implant Users by Age.

Shukor N, Seo Y, Han W J Audiol Otol. 2023; 27(4):193-204.

PMID: 37533349 PMC: 10603281. DOI: 10.7874/jao.2023.00087.


References
1.
Chen J, Chuang A, McMahon C, Hsieh J, Tung T, Li L . Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Pediatrics. 2010; 125(4):e793-800. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-3620. View

2.
Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J . Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2009; 30(4):419-31. PMC: 2873678. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a165be. View

3.
Strait D, Kraus N . Biological impact of auditory expertise across the life span: musicians as a model of auditory learning. Hear Res. 2013; 308:109-21. PMC: 3947192. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.004. View

4.
Chatterjee M, Peng S . Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition. Hear Res. 2007; 235(1-2):143-56. PMC: 2237883. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004. View

5.
Smith Z, Delgutte B, Oxenham A . Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature. 2002; 416(6876):87-90. PMC: 2268248. DOI: 10.1038/416087a. View