» Articles » PMID: 17709574

Perceptual Learning and Auditory Training in Cochlear Implant Recipients

Overview
Journal Trends Amplif
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2007 Aug 22
PMID 17709574
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Learning electrically stimulated speech patterns can be a new and difficult experience for cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Recent studies have shown that most implant recipients at least partially adapt to these new patterns via passive, daily-listening experiences. Gradually introducing a speech processor parameter (eg, the degree of spectral mismatch) may provide for more complete and less stressful adaptation. Although the implant device restores hearing sensation and the continued use of the implant provides some degree of adaptation, active auditory rehabilitation may be necessary to maximize the benefit of implantation for CI recipients. Currently, there are scant resources for auditory rehabilitation for adult, postlingually deafened CI recipients. We recently developed a computer-assisted speech-training program to provide the means to conduct auditory rehabilitation at home. The training software targets important acoustic contrasts among speech stimuli, provides auditory and visual feedback, and incorporates progressive training techniques, thereby maintaining recipients' interest during the auditory training exercises. Our recent studies demonstrate the effectiveness of targeted auditory training in improving CI recipients' speech and music perception. Provided with an inexpensive and effective auditory training program, CI recipients may find the motivation and momentum to get the most from the implant device.

Citing Articles

Continuous monitoring of temporal skills during long-term in-home training by cochlear implant users.

Szymanski K, Gawryluk K, Brancewicz M Heliyon. 2025; 11(3):e41817.

PMID: 39975818 PMC: 11835561. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41817.


Evaluating Changes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users' Brain and Behavior Following Auditory Training.

Jeon E, Driscoll V, Mussoi B, Scheperle R, Guthe E, Gfeller K Ear Hear. 2024; 46(1):150-162.

PMID: 39044323 PMC: 11649490. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001569.


Neural correlates of flexible sound perception in the auditory midbrain and thalamus.

Ying R, Stolzberg D, Caras M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38645241 PMC: 11030403. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.12.589266.


Systematic Review of Auditory Training Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.

Dornhoffer J, Chidarala S, Patel T, Khandalavala K, Nguyen S, Schvartz-Leyzac K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38256533 PMC: 10816985. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020400.


Effects of spectral smearing on speech understanding and masking release in simulated bilateral cochlear implants.

Cychosz M, Xu K, Fu Q PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0287728.

PMID: 37917727 PMC: 10621938. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287728.


References
1.
Bradlow A, Kraus N, Hayes E . Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003; 46(1):80-97. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/007). View

2.
Fu Q, Shannon R, Galvin 3rd J . Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002; 112(4):1664-74. DOI: 10.1121/1.1502901. View

3.
Gentner T, Margoliash D . Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects. Nature. 2003; 424(6949):669-74. PMC: 2631575. DOI: 10.1038/nature01731. View

4.
Kong Y, Cruz R, Jones J, Zeng F . Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear. 2004; 25(2):173-85. DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000120365.97792.2f. View

5.
Svirsky M, Teoh S, Neuburger H . Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol. 2004; 9(4):224-33. DOI: 10.1159/000078392. View