» Articles » PMID: 26494842

Strong Constraint on Human Genes Escaping X-Inactivation Is Modulated by Their Expression Level and Breadth in Both Sexes

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Oct 24
PMID 26494842
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In eutherian mammals, X-linked gene expression is normalized between XX females and XY males through the process of X chromosome inactivation (XCI). XCI results in silencing of transcription from one ChrX homolog per female cell. However, approximately 25% of human ChrX genes escape XCI to some extent and exhibit biallelic expression in females. The evolutionary basis of this phenomenon is not entirely clear, but high sequence conservation of XCI escapers suggests that purifying selection may directly or indirectly drive XCI escape at these loci. One hypothesis is that this signal results from contributions to developmental and physiological sex differences, but presently there is limited evidence supporting this model in humans. Another potential driver of this signal is selection for high and/or broad gene expression in both sexes, which are strong predictors of reduced nucleotide substitution rates in mammalian genes. Here, we compared purifying selection and gene expression patterns of human XCI escapers with those of X-inactivated genes in both sexes. When we accounted for the functional status of each ChrX gene's Y-linked homolog (or "gametolog"), we observed that XCI escapers exhibit greater degrees of purifying selection in the human lineage than X-inactivated genes, as well as higher and broader gene expression than X-inactivated genes across tissues in both sexes. These results highlight a significant role for gene expression in both sexes in driving purifying selection on XCI escapers, and emphasize these genes' potential importance in human disease.

Citing Articles

Evolutionary divergence between homologous X-Y chromosome genes shapes sex-biased biology.

DeCasien A, Tsai K, Liu S, Thomas A, Raznahan A Nat Ecol Evol. 2025; 9(3):448-463.

PMID: 39856216 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02627-x.


Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.

Saunders P, Muyle A Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(11).

PMID: 39417444 PMC: 11542634. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae218.


Leveraging sex-genetic interactions to understand brain disorders: recent advances and current gaps.

Neale N, Lona-Durazo F, Ryten M, Gagliano Taliun S Brain Commun. 2024; 6(3):fcae192.

PMID: 38894947 PMC: 11184352. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae192.


XIST dampens X chromosome activity in a SPEN-dependent manner during early human development.

Alfeghaly C, Castel G, Cazottes E, Moscatelli M, Moinard E, Casanova M Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2024; 31(10):1589-1600.

PMID: 38834912 PMC: 11479943. DOI: 10.1038/s41594-024-01325-3.


Escaping but not the inactive X-linked protein complex coding genes may achieve X-chromosome dosage compensation and underlie X chromosome inactivation-related diseases.

Xing Z, Zhang Y, Tian Z, Wang M, Xiao W, Zhu C Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e17721.

PMID: 37449161 PMC: 10336589. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17721.


References
1.
Lahn B, Page D . Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome. Science. 1999; 286(5441):964-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5441.964. View

2.
Schultz M, He Y, Whitaker J, Hariharan M, Mukamel E, Leung D . Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation. Nature. 2015; 523(7559):212-6. PMC: 4499021. DOI: 10.1038/nature14465. View

3.
Kent W, Sugnet C, Furey T, Roskin K, Pringle T, Zahler A . The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002; 12(6):996-1006. PMC: 186604. DOI: 10.1101/gr.229102. View

4.
Skaletsky H, Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Minx P, Cordum H, Hillier L, Brown L . The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes. Nature. 2003; 423(6942):825-37. DOI: 10.1038/nature01722. View

5.
Brown C, Greally J . A stain upon the silence: genes escaping X inactivation. Trends Genet. 2003; 19(8):432-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00177-X. View