» Articles » PMID: 26489510

Comparative Study on Gene Set and Pathway Topology-based Enrichment Methods

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Oct 23
PMID 26489510
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Enrichment analysis is a popular approach to identify pathways or sets of genes which are significantly enriched in the context of differentially expressed genes. The traditional gene set enrichment approach considers a pathway as a simple gene list disregarding any knowledge of gene or protein interactions. In contrast, the new group of so called pathway topology-based methods integrates the topological structure of a pathway into the analysis.

Methods: We comparatively investigated gene set and pathway topology-based enrichment approaches, considering three gene set and four topological methods. These methods were compared in two extensive simulation studies and on a benchmark of 36 real datasets, providing the same pathway input data for all methods.

Results: In the benchmark data analysis both types of methods showed a comparable ability to detect enriched pathways. The first simulation study was conducted with KEGG pathways, which showed considerable gene overlaps between each other. In this study with original KEGG pathways, none of the topology-based methods outperformed the gene set approach. Therefore, a second simulation study was performed on non-overlapping pathways created by unique gene IDs. Here, methods accounting for pathway topology reached higher accuracy than the gene set methods, however their sensitivity was lower.

Conclusions: We conducted one of the first comprehensive comparative works on evaluating gene set against pathway topology-based enrichment methods. The topological methods showed better performance in the simulation scenarios with non-overlapping pathways, however, they were not conclusively better in the other scenarios. This suggests that simple gene set approach might be sufficient to detect an enriched pathway under realistic circumstances. Nevertheless, more extensive studies and further benchmark data are needed to systematically evaluate these methods and to assess what gain and cost pathway topology information introduces into enrichment analysis. Both types of methods for enrichment analysis require further improvements in order to deal with the problem of pathway overlaps.

Citing Articles

Classification-based pathway analysis using GPNet with novel P-value computation.

Lu H, Rezapour M, Baha H, Niazi M, Narayanan A, Gurcan M Brief Bioinform. 2025; 26(1).

PMID: 39879387 PMC: 11775473. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaf039.


Combined Analysis of Multi-Study miRNA and mRNA Expression Data Shows Overlap of Selected miRNAs Involved in West Nile Virus Infections.

Boge F, Ruff S, Kumar S, Selle M, Becker S, Jung K Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(8).

PMID: 39202390 PMC: 11353516. DOI: 10.3390/genes15081030.


Assessment of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis using curated RNA-seq-based benchmarks.

Candia J, Ferrucci L PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302696.

PMID: 38753612 PMC: 11098418. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302696.


bootGSEA: a bootstrap and rank aggregation pipeline for multi-study and multi-omics enrichment analyses.

Kumar S, Tapken I, Kuhn D, Claus P, Jung K Front Bioinform. 2024; 4:1380928.

PMID: 38633435 PMC: 11021641. DOI: 10.3389/fbinf.2024.1380928.


Tiny Guides, Big Impact: Focus on the Opportunities and Challenges of miR-Based Treatments for ARDS.

Vaswani C, Simone J, Pavelick J, Wu X, Tan G, Ektesabi A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(5).

PMID: 38474059 PMC: 10931977. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052812.


References
1.
Croft D, OKelly G, Wu G, Haw R, Gillespie M, Matthews L . Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 39(Database issue):D691-7. PMC: 3013646. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq1018. View

2.
Pei H, Li L, Fridley B, Jenkins G, Kalari K, Lingle W . FKBP51 affects cancer cell response to chemotherapy by negatively regulating Akt. Cancer Cell. 2009; 16(3):259-66. PMC: 2755578. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.07.016. View

3.
Gu Z, Liu J, Cao K, Zhang J, Wang J . Centrality-based pathway enrichment: a systematic approach for finding significant pathways dominated by key genes. BMC Syst Biol. 2012; 6:56. PMC: 3443660. DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-56. View

4.
He H, Jazdzewski K, Li W, Liyanarachchi S, Nagy R, Volinia S . The role of microRNA genes in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(52):19075-80. PMC: 1323209. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509603102. View

5.
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha V, Mukherjee S, Ebert B, Gillette M . Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(43):15545-50. PMC: 1239896. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. View