» Articles » PMID: 26471505

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

Overview
Journal J Hepatol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2015 Oct 17
PMID 26471505
Citations 113
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Aims: Multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been demonstrated to quantify hepatic fibrosis, iron, and steatosis. The aim of this study was to determine if MR can be used to predict negative clinical outcomes in liver disease patients.

Methods: Patients with chronic liver disease (n=112) were recruited for MR imaging and data on the development of liver related clinical events were collected by medical records review. The median follow-up was 27months. MR data were analysed blinded for the Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis score (LIF; <1, 1-1.99, 2-2.99, and ⩾3 representing normal, mild, moderate, and severe liver disease, respectively), T2∗ for liver iron content and proportion of liver fat. Baseline liver biopsy was performed in 102 patients.

Results: Liver disease aetiologies included non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (35%) and chronic viral hepatitis (30%). Histologically, fibrosis was mild in 54 (48%), moderate in 17 (15%), and severe in 31 (28%) patients. Overall mortality was 5%. Ten patients (11%) developed at least one liver related clinical event. The negative predictive value of LIF<2 was 100%. Two patients with LIF 2-2.99 and eight with LIF⩾3 had a clinical event. Patients with LIF⩾3 had a higher cumulative risk for developing clinical events, compared to those with LIF<1 (p=0.02) and LIF 1-1.99 (p=0.03). Cox regression analysis including all 3 variables (fat, iron, LIF) resulted in an enhanced LIF predictive value.

Conclusions: Non-invasive standardised multiparametric MR technology may be used to predict clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease.

Citing Articles

FAP-catalyzed in situ self-assembly of magnetic resonance imaging probe for early and precise staging of liver fibrosis.

Wu Z, Zeng W, Yang W, Yi J, Liu D, Xu Y Sci Adv. 2025; 11(11):eadt6082.

PMID: 40073128 PMC: 11900868. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adt6082.


Autologous macrophage therapy for liver cirrhosis: a phase 2 open-label randomized controlled trial.

Brennan P, MacMillan M, Manship T, Moroni F, Glover A, Troland D Nat Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39794616 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03406-8.


Practical approach to quantitative liver and pancreas MRI in children.

Kemp J, Ghosh A, Dillman J, Krishnasarma R, Manhard M, Tipirneni-Sajja A Pediatr Radiol. 2025; 55(1):36-57.

PMID: 39760887 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-024-06133-x.


Accelerated 2D radial Look-Locker T1 mapping using a deep learning-based rapid inversion recovery sampling technique.

Ahanonu E, Goerke U, Johnson K, Toner B, Martin D, Deshpande V NMR Biomed. 2024; 37(12):e5266.

PMID: 39358992 PMC: 11892465. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5266.


MRI-serum-based score accurately identifies patients undergoing liver transplant without rejection avoiding the need for liver biopsy: A multisite European study.

Schaapman J, Shumbayawonda E, Castelo-Branco M, Caseiro Alves F, Costa T, Fitzpatrick E Liver Transpl. 2024; .

PMID: 39171987 PMC: 11827683. DOI: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000450.


References
1.
Huang Y, Yang S, Fu S, Wang T, Hsu C, Chen D . Increased risk of cirrhosis and its decompensation in chronic hepatitis C patients with new-onset diabetes: a nationwide cohort study. Hepatology. 2014; 60(3):807-14. DOI: 10.1002/hep.27212. View

2.
Torok N, Dranoff J, Schuppan D, Friedman S . Strategies and endpoints of antifibrotic drug trials: Summary and recommendations from the AASLD Emerging Trends Conference, Chicago, June 2014. Hepatology. 2015; 62(2):627-34. PMC: 4515973. DOI: 10.1002/hep.27720. View

3.
Kim K, Park M, Kim I, Kiefer B, Chung W, Kim M . Quantitative evaluation of liver cirrhosis using T1 relaxation time with 3 tesla MRI before and after oxygen inhalation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 36(2):405-10. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23620. View

4.
Hines C, Bley T, Lindstrom M, Reeder S . Repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography for quantification of hepatic stiffness. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31(3):725-31. PMC: 2901399. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22066. View

5.
Nascimbeni F, Lebray P, Fedchuk L, Oliveira C, Alvares-da-Silva M, Varault A . Significant variations in elastometry measurements made within short-term in patients with chronic liver diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 13(4):763-71.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.037. View