» Articles » PMID: 26458520

Patterns of Effective Connectivity During Memory Encoding and Retrieval Differ Between Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Healthy Older Adults

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Oct 14
PMID 26458520
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research has shown that there is considerable overlap in the neural networks mediating successful memory encoding and retrieval. However, little is known about how the relevant human brain regions interact during these distinct phases of memory or how such interactions are affected by memory deficits that characterize mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a condition that often precedes dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Here we employed multivariate Granger causality analysis using autoregressive modeling of inferred neuronal time series obtained by deconvolving the hemodynamic response function from measured blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) time series data, in order to examine the effective connectivity between brain regions during successful encoding and/or retrieval of object location associations in MCI patients and comparable healthy older adults. During encoding, healthy older adults demonstrated a left hemisphere dominant pattern where the inferior frontal junction, anterior intraparietal sulcus (likely involving the parietal eye fields), and posterior cingulate cortex drove activation in most left hemisphere regions and virtually every right hemisphere region tested. These regions are part of a frontoparietal network that mediates top-down cognitive control and is implicated in successful memory formation. In contrast, in the MCI patients, the right frontal eye field drove activation in every left hemisphere region examined, suggesting reliance on more basic visual search processes. Retrieval in the healthy older adults was primarily driven by the right hippocampus with lesser contributions of the right anterior thalamic nuclei and right inferior frontal sulcus, consistent with theoretical models holding the hippocampus as critical for the successful retrieval of memories. The pattern differed in MCI patients, in whom the right inferior frontal junction and right anterior thalamus drove successful memory retrieval, reflecting the characteristic hippocampal dysfunction of these patients. These findings demonstrate that neural network interactions differ markedly between MCI patients and healthy older adults. Future efforts will investigate the impact of cognitive rehabilitation of memory on these connectivity patterns.

Citing Articles

The confound of hemodynamic response function variability in human resting-state functional MRI studies.

Rangaprakash D, Barry R, Deshpande G Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:934138.

PMID: 37521709 PMC: 10375034. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.934138.


Effective Connectivity Evaluation of Resting-State Brain Networks in Alzheimer's Disease, Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Normal Aging: An Exploratory Study.

Mohammadian F, Noroozian M, Sadeghi A, Malekian V, Saffar A, Talebi M Brain Sci. 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36831808 PMC: 9954618. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13020265.


Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improves Executive Functioning through Modulation of Social Cognitive Networks in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Preliminary Results.

Sacco L, Ceroni M, Pacifico D, Zerboni G, Rossi S, Galati S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36766520 PMC: 9914912. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030415.


Noninvasive Characterization of Functional Pathways in Layer-Specific Microcircuits of the Human Brain Using 7T fMRI.

Deshpande G, Wang Y Brain Sci. 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36291295 PMC: 9599333. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12101361.


Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuant and NeuroGage in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Ross D, Seabaugh J, Seabaugh J, Barcelona J, Seabaugh D, Wright K Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:715807.

PMID: 35463926 PMC: 9027332. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.715807.


References
1.
Baldauf D, Desimone R . Neural mechanisms of object-based attention. Science. 2014; 344(6182):424-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1247003. View

2.
Liu P, Hebrank A, Rodrigue K, Kennedy K, Section J, Park D . Age-related differences in memory-encoding fMRI responses after accounting for decline in vascular reactivity. Neuroimage. 2013; 78:415-25. PMC: 3694392. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.053. View

3.
Kelley W, Miezin F, McDermott K, Buckner R, Raichle M, Cohen N . Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding. Neuron. 1998; 20(5):927-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80474-2. View

4.
Duff K, Humphreys Clark J, OBryant S, Mold J, Schiffer R, Sutker P . Utility of the RBANS in detecting cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer's disease: sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powers. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008; 23(5):603-12. PMC: 2570647. DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2008.06.004. View

5.
Xu Y . Inferior frontal junction biases perception through neural synchrony. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014; 18(9):447-8. PMC: 4149843. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.001. View