» Articles » PMID: 26458269

CT and MRI Determination of Intermuscular Space Within Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles at Different Intervertebral Disc Levels

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Oct 13
PMID 26458269
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recognition of the intermuscular spaces within lumbar paraspinal muscles is critically important for using the paramedian muscle-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. As such, it is important to determine the intermuscular spaces within the lumbar paraspinal muscles by utilizing modern medical imaging such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: A total of 30 adult cadavers were studied by sectional anatomic dissection, and 60 patients were examined using CT (16 slices, 3-mm thickness, 3-mm intersection gap, n = 30) and MRI (3.0T, T2-WI, 5-mm thickness, 1-mm intersection gap, n = 30). The distances between the midline and the superficial points of the intermuscular spaces at different intervertebral disc levels were measured.

Results: Based on study of our cadavers, the mean distances from the midline to the intermuscular space between multifidus and longissimus, from intervertebral disc levels L1-L2 to L5-S1, were 0.9, 1.1, 1.7, 3.0, and 3.5 cm, respectively. Compared with the upper levels (L1-L3), the superficial location at the lower level (L4-S1) is more laterally to the midline (P<0.05). The intermuscular space between sacrospinalis and quadratus lumborum, and that between longissimus and iliocostalis did not exist at L4-S1. The intermuscular spaces in patients also varied at different levels of the lumbar spine showing a low discontinuous density in CT and a high signal in MRI. There were no significant differences between the observations in cadavers and those made using CT and MRI.

Conclusion: The intermuscular spaces within the paraspinal muscles vary at different intervertebral disc levels. Preoperative CT and MRI can facilitate selection of the muscle-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. This paper demonstrates the efficacy of medical imaging techniques in surgical planning.

Citing Articles

An enhanced AlexNet-Based model for femoral bone tumor classification and diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging.

Chen X, Chen H, Wan J, Li J, Wei F J Bone Oncol. 2024; 48:100626.

PMID: 39290649 PMC: 11407034. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100626.


Improved localization and segmentation of spinal bone metastases in MRI with nnUNet radiomics.

Xu Y, Meng C, Chen D, Cao Y, Wang X, Ji P J Bone Oncol. 2024; 48:100630.

PMID: 39281712 PMC: 11399709. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100630.


Automated measurement of lumbar pedicle screw parameters using deep learning algorithm on preoperative CT scans.

Zhang Q, Zhao F, Zhang Y, Huang M, Gong X, Deng X J Bone Oncol. 2024; 47:100627.

PMID: 39188420 PMC: 11345936. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100627.


GHA-DenseNet prediction and diagnosis of malignancy in femoral bone tumors using magnetic resonance imaging.

Yuguang Y, Chen Y, Zhu D, Huang Y, Huang Y, Li X J Bone Oncol. 2024; 44:100520.

PMID: 38261934 PMC: 10797540. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100520.


FemurTumorNet: Bone tumor classification in the proximal femur using DenseNet model based on radiographs.

Pan C, Lian L, Chen J, Huang R J Bone Oncol. 2023; 42:100504.

PMID: 37766930 PMC: 10520341. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100504.


References
1.
Wiltse L, BATEMAN J, Hutchinson R, Nelson W . The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968; 50(5):919-26. View

2.
Foley K, Holly L, Schwender J . Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(15 Suppl):S26-35. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076895.52418.5E. View

3.
Macintosh J, Bogduk N . 1987 Volvo award in basic science. The morphology of the lumbar erector spinae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12(7):658-68. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198709000-00004. View

4.
Bustami F . A new description of the lumbar erector spinae muscle in man. J Anat. 1986; 144:81-91. PMC: 1166464. View

5.
Wiltse L, Spencer C . New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988; 13(6):696-706. View