» Articles » PMID: 19122093

Architectural Analysis and Intraoperative Measurements Demonstrate the Unique Design of the Multifidus Muscle for Lumbar Spine Stability

Overview
Date 2009 Jan 6
PMID 19122093
Citations 96
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Muscular instability is an important risk factor for lumbar spine injury and chronic low-back pain. Although the lumbar multifidus muscle is considered an important paraspinal muscle, its design features are not completely understood. The purpose of the present study was to determine the architectural properties, in vivo sarcomere length operating range, and passive mechanical properties of the human multifidus muscle. We hypothesized that its architecture would be characterized by short fibers and a large physiological cross-sectional area and that it would operate over a relatively wide range of sarcomere lengths but would have very stiff passive material properties.

Methods: The lumbar spines of eight cadaver specimens were excised en bloc from T12 to the sacrum. Multifidus muscles were isolated from each vertebral level, permitting the architectural measurements of mass, sarcomere length, normalized fiber length, physiological cross-sectional area, and fiber length-to-muscle length ratio. To determine the sarcomere length operating range of the muscle, sarcomere lengths were measured from intraoperative biopsy specimens that were obtained with the spine in the flexed and extended positions. The material properties of single muscle fibers were obtained from passive stress-strain tests of excised biopsy specimens.

Results: The average muscle mass (and standard error) was 146 +/- 8.7 g, and the average sarcomere length was 2.27 +/- 0.06 microm, yielding an average normalized fiber length of 5.66 +/- 0.65 cm, an average physiological cross-sectional area of 23.9 +/- 3.0 cm(2), and an average fiber length-to-muscle length ratio of 0.21 +/- 0.03. Intraoperative sarcomere length measurements revealed that the muscle operates from 1.98 +/- 0.15 microm in extension to 2.70 +/- 0.11 microm in flexion. Passive mechanical data suggested that the material properties of the muscle are comparable with those of muscles of the arm or leg.

Conclusions: The architectural design (a high cross-sectional area and a low fiber length-to-muscle length ratio) demonstrates that the multifidus muscle is uniquely designed as a stabilizer to produce large forces. Furthermore, multifidus sarcomeres are positioned on the ascending portion of the length-tension curve, allowing the muscle to become stronger as the spine assumes a forward-leaning posture.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of abdominal and lumbar multifidus muscles thickness and relation to endurance, pain, fatigue and functional mobility in patients with Fibromyalgia syndrome: a case-control study.

Mirza Y, Sari F, Yilmaz P, Kucuk A Rheumatol Int. 2025; 45(3):56.

PMID: 39982517 PMC: 11845533. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-025-05813-7.


Quantitative evaluation of risk factors for low back pain in young patients using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging and proton density fat fraction analyses.

Yang Y, Lin W, Wen H, Luo X, Zhou X, Zou F Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2024; 15:20406223241293260.

PMID: 39493004 PMC: 11528588. DOI: 10.1177/20406223241293260.


The Correlation between Unilateral Hip Bridge Endurance and Lumbar Multifidi Sonologic Characteristics in Physically Active Allied Healthcare Professionals at St. Luke's Medical Center - Quezon City: A Cross-sectional Study.

Navarroza E, Senolos G, Leochico C Acta Med Philipp. 2024; 58(15):46-54.

PMID: 39308877 PMC: 11413463. DOI: 10.47895/amp.vi0.8185.


Muscle short-range stiffness behaves like a maxwell element, not a spring: Implications for joint stability.

Barrett J, Malakoutian M, Fels S, Brown S, Oxland T PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0307977.

PMID: 39141670 PMC: 11324116. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307977.


Assessment of fitting methods and variability of IVIM parameters in muscles of the lumbar spine at rest.

Englund E, Berry D, Behun J, Frank L, Ward S, Shahidi B Front Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 2.

PMID: 39135679 PMC: 11318298. DOI: 10.3389/fmscd.2024.1386276.


References
1.
Gille O, Jolivet E, Dousset V, Degrise C, Obeid I, Vital J . Erector spinae muscle changes on magnetic resonance imaging following lumbar surgery through a posterior approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(11):1236-41. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31805471fe. View

2.
Kang C, Shin M, Kim S, Lee S, Lee C . MRI of paraspinal muscles in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients and control patients with chronic low back pain. Clin Radiol. 2007; 62(5):479-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.12.002. View

3.
Kim K, Lee S, Suk K, Bae S . The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(6):712-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000202533.05906.ea. View

4.
Delp S, Suryanarayanan S, Murray W, UHLIR J, Triolo R . Architecture of the rectus abdominis, quadratus lumborum, and erector spinae. J Biomech. 2001; 34(3):371-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00202-5. View

5.
Bogduk N, Macintosh J, Pearcy M . A universal model of the lumbar back muscles in the upright position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17(8):897-913. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199208000-00007. View