» Articles » PMID: 26449998

Determinants of Effort Intolerance in Patients With Heart Failure: Combined Echocardiography and Cardiopulmonary Stress Protocol

Overview
Journal JACC Heart Fail
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2015 Oct 10
PMID 26449998
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess individual mechanisms of effort intolerance in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), or normal cardiac function using combined echocardiography and cardiopulmonary stress testing.

Background: Combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary tests visualize cardiac chambers in 4 well-defined activity levels (rest, unloaded, anaerobic threshold, and peak), allowing noninvasive assessment of cardiac function, hemodynamics, and arterial venous oxygen content difference (AVo(2)Diff) during all stages.

Methods: Left ventricular volumes, stroke volume (SV), S', E/e', oxygen consumption (Vo(2)), and AVo(2)Diff were measured in all effort stages using ramp semirecumbent cycle prolonged (≥8 min) exercise in 45 consecutive subjects evaluated for effort intolerance (14 normal cardiac function, 16 HFpEF, and 15 HFrEF patients; age 56.5 ± 16 years; 73% male).

Results: In HFpEF and HFrEF, the changes in Vo2 were attenuated (between group p = 0.003; group by time interaction p < 0.0001), as well as peak heart rate (p = 0.0001; p = 0.0001) and SV (p = 0.006; p = 0.0001). End-diastolic volume to E/e' ratio (measure of compliance) was superior in HFrEF and normal patients at baseline but worsened in HFpEF and HFrEF at peak exercise (8.3 ± 4 vs. 11.6 ± 5 vs. 19.1 ± 8; p = 0.004; p = 0.01). Functional mitral regurgitation worsened even during the unloaded stage, mostly in patients with HFrEF, but also in several patients with HFpEF. In multivariable analysis, heart rate response (p = 0.007), and AVo(2)Diff (p < 0.0001) were the most significant independent predictors of effort capacity; SV was not.

Conclusions: Combined tests are feasible and allow noninvasive evaluation of effort intolerance. In HFpEF and HFrEF patients, exercise intolerance is predominantly due to chronotropic incompetence and peripheral factors. Combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary tests may have potential for clinical management and selection of patients for trials.

Citing Articles

Cardiopulmonary exercise capacity markers and their link to symptom burden in patients at risk for heart failure with non-reduced ejection fraction.

Kwast S, Hoffmann J, Pokel C, Falz R, Schulze A, Schroter T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8940.

PMID: 40089637 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-94172-1.


Exercise intolerance in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: insights from exercise stress echocardiography.

Zhu W, Tian R, Guo D, Lin M, Cai Q, Qin Y Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1442263.

PMID: 39669415 PMC: 11634879. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1442263.


Prognostic value of heart rate and oxygen pulse response in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction over 40.

Tashiro M, Goda A, Yanagisawa Y, Nakamaru R, Funabashi S, Takeuchi S Clin Res Cardiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39557668 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-024-02577-1.


CA125 outperforms NT-proBNP in the prediction of maximum aerobic capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and kidney dysfunction.

Nunez-Marin G, Palau P, Dominguez E, de la Espriella R, Lopez L, Flor C Clin Kidney J. 2024; 17(8):sfae199.

PMID: 39135938 PMC: 11317843. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae199.


Exercise limitation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise test.

Erez Y, Ghantous E, Shetrit A, Zamanzadeh R, Zahler D, Granot Y ESC Heart Fail. 2024; 11(4):2287-2294.

PMID: 38638011 PMC: 11287336. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14776.