» Articles » PMID: 26448054

An Adapting Auditory-motor Feedback Loop Can Contribute to Generating Vocal Repetition

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Oct 9
PMID 26448054
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Consecutive repetition of actions is common in behavioral sequences. Although integration of sensory feedback with internal motor programs is important for sequence generation, if and how feedback contributes to repetitive actions is poorly understood. Here we study how auditory feedback contributes to generating repetitive syllable sequences in songbirds. We propose that auditory signals provide positive feedback to ongoing motor commands, but this influence decays as feedback weakens from response adaptation during syllable repetitions. Computational models show that this mechanism explains repeat distributions observed in Bengalese finch song. We experimentally confirmed two predictions of this mechanism in Bengalese finches: removal of auditory feedback by deafening reduces syllable repetitions; and neural responses to auditory playback of repeated syllable sequences gradually adapt in sensory-motor nucleus HVC. Together, our results implicate a positive auditory-feedback loop with adaptation in generating repetitive vocalizations, and suggest sensory adaptation is important for feedback control of motor sequences.

Citing Articles

Visually-guided compensation of deafening-induced song deterioration.

Rolland M, Zai A, Hahnloser R, Del Negro C, Giret N Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1521407.

PMID: 39981385 PMC: 11839652. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521407.


The Temporal Organization of Learned Vocal Behavior Is Predicted by Species Rather Than Experience.

Edwards J, Edwards J, Rivera M, Woolley S, Woolley S J Neurosci. 2025; 45(11).

PMID: 39890464 PMC: 11905348. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0576-24.2025.


Partially Observable Markov Models Inferred Using Statistical Tests Reveal Context-Dependent Syllable Transitions in Bengalese Finch Songs.

Lu J, Surendralal S, Bouchard K, Jin D J Neurosci. 2025; 45(9).

PMID: 39779376 PMC: 11866996. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0522-24.2024.


Goal-directed and flexible modulation of syllable sequence within birdsong.

Kawaji T, Fujibayashi M, Abe K Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):3419.

PMID: 38658545 PMC: 11043396. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47824-1.


Lesions in a songbird vocal circuit increase variability in song syntax.

Koparkar A, Warren T, Charlesworth J, Shin S, Brainard M, Veit L Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 38635312 PMC: 11026095. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.93272.


References
1.
Markram H, Tsodyks M . Redistribution of synaptic efficacy between neocortical pyramidal neurons. Nature. 1996; 382(6594):807-10. DOI: 10.1038/382807a0. View

2.
Kent R . Research on speech motor control and its disorders: a review and prospective. J Commun Disord. 2000; 33(5):391-427; quiz 428. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9924(00)00023-x. View

3.
Warren T, Charlesworth J, Tumer E, Brainard M . Variable sequencing is actively maintained in a well learned motor skill. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(44):15414-25. PMC: 3752123. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1254-12.2012. View

4.
Wild J . Neural pathways for the control of birdsong production. J Neurobiol. 1997; 33(5):653-70. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(19971105)33:5<653::aid-neu11>3.0.co;2-a. View

5.
Billimoria C, Kraus B, Narayan R, Maddox R, Sen K . Invariance and sensitivity to intensity in neural discrimination of natural sounds. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(25):6304-8. PMC: 2730838. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0961-08.2008. View