» Articles » PMID: 26441732

Cross-linguistic Evidence for Gender As a Prominence Feature

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2015 Oct 7
PMID 26441732
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper discusses recent findings in the online sentence processing research that suggest to consider gender information a prominence feature. Prominence features are hierarchically ordered information types that interact with formal features of arguments (e.g., grammatical functions, thematic roles) and thus determine the readers' ability to efficiently interpret linguistic ambiguities. While previous research addressed a number of prominence features (e.g., animacy, definiteness, person), there is now first empirical evidence indicating that gender information also influences the assignment of thematic roles across languages. Grammatically masculine role nouns are processed faster as agents than patients compared to feminine ones. Stereotypically male role nouns (e.g., electrician) are integrated with an agent role easier than neutral ones (e.g., musician), which in turn are integrated easier than female ones (e.g., beautician). Conceptualizing gender as a prominence feature will not only expand our knowledge about information types relevant for online comprehension but also uncover subtle gender biases present in language. The present work explores the possibility for a theoretical integration of social psychological and psycholinguistic research focusing on gender with research on prominence. Potential advantages an interdisciplinary approach to the study of gender as a prominence feature, open questions and future directions are discussed.

Citing Articles

The verb-self link: An implicit association test study.

Weis P, Nikadon J, Herbert C, Formanowicz M Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 29(5):1946-1959.

PMID: 35501546 PMC: 9568455. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02105-0.


A Language Index of Grammatical Gender Dimensions to Study the Impact of Grammatical Gender on the Way We Perceive Women and Men.

Gygax P, Elmiger D, Zufferey S, Garnham A, Sczesny S, von Stockhausen L Front Psychol. 2019; 10:1604.

PMID: 31379661 PMC: 6644918. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01604.


The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics.

Hollis G, Westbury C Psychon Bull Rev. 2016; 23(6):1744-1756.

PMID: 27138012 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1053-2.

References
1.
Friederici A, Weissenborn J . Mapping sentence form onto meaning: the syntax-semantic interface. Brain Res. 2006; 1146:50-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.038. View

2.
Koenig A, Eagly A, Mitchell A, Ristikari T . Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychol Bull. 2011; 137(4):616-42. DOI: 10.1037/a0023557. View

3.
Carreiras M, Garnham A, Oakhill J, Cain K . The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: evidence from English and Spanish. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1996; 49(3):639-63. DOI: 10.1080/713755647. View

4.
Bates E, Devescovi A, Hernandez A, Pizzamiglio L . Gender priming in Italian. Percept Psychophys. 1996; 58(7):992-1004. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206827. View

5.
Beukeboom C, Finkenauer C, Wigboldus D . The negation bias: when negations signal stereotypic expectancies. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 99(6):978-92. DOI: 10.1037/a0020861. View