» Articles » PMID: 17372839

What's in a (role) Name? Formal and Conceptual Aspects of Comprehending Personal Nouns

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Psychology
Date 2007 Mar 21
PMID 17372839
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two eye-tracking studies assessed effects of grammatical and conceptual gender cues in generic role name processing in German. Participants read passages about a social or occupational group introduced by way of a generic role name (e.g., Soldaten/soldiers, Künstler/artists). Later in the passage the gender of this group was specified by the anaphoric expression diese Männer/these men or diese Frauen/these women. Testing masculine generic role names of male, female or neutral conceptual gender (Exp. 1) showed that a gender mismatch between the role name's conceptual gender and the anaphor significantly slowed reading immediately before and after the anaphoric noun. A mismatch between the antecedent's grammatical gender and the anaphor slowed down the reading of the anaphoric noun itself. Testing grammatically gender-unmarked role names (Exp. 2) revealed a general male bias in participants' understanding, irrespective of grammatical or conceptual gender. The experiments extend previous findings on gender effects to non-referential role names and generic contexts. Theoretical aspects of gender and plural reference as well as gender information in mental models are discussed.

Citing Articles

Neutral is not fair enough: testing the efficiency of different language gender-fair strategies.

Spinelli E, Chevrot J, Varnet L Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1256779.

PMID: 37842707 PMC: 10570613. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1256779.


Performance-related feedback as a strategy to overcome spontaneous occupational stereotypes.

Finnegan E, Garnham A, Oakhill J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 77(6):1312-1331.

PMID: 37578102 PMC: 11103928. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231196861.


The effects of grammatical gender on the processing of occupational role names in Slovene: An event-related potential study.

Mikic Ljubi J, Matkovic A, Bon J, Mrcela A Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1010708.

PMID: 36600722 PMC: 9807137. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010708.


Are Second Person Masculine Generics Easier to Process for Men than for Women? Evidence from Polish.

Szuba A, Redl T, de Hoop H J Psycholinguist Res. 2022; 51(4):819-845.

PMID: 35303215 PMC: 9338112. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-022-09859-7.


The effect of language on performance: do gendered languages fail women in maths?.

Kricheli-Katz T, Regev T NPJ Sci Learn. 2021; 6(1):9.

PMID: 33824344 PMC: 8024272. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-021-00087-7.


References
1.
Carreiras M, Garnham A, Oakhill J, Cain K . The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: evidence from English and Spanish. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1996; 49(3):639-63. DOI: 10.1080/713755647. View

2.
Oakhill J, Garnham A, Reynolds D . Immediate activation of stereotypical gender information. Mem Cognit. 2006; 33(6):972-83. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193206. View

3.
Rigalleau F, Caplan D . Effects of gender marking in pronominal coindexation. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000; 53(1):23-52. DOI: 10.1080/713755884. View

4.
Schmitt B, Lamers M, Munte T . Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002; 14(3):333-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00136-2. View

5.
Osterhout L, Bersick M, McLaughlin J . Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes. Mem Cognit. 1997; 25(3):273-85. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211283. View