» Articles » PMID: 26431963

MELK-T1, a Small-molecule Inhibitor of Protein Kinase MELK, Decreases DNA-damage Tolerance in Proliferating Cancer Cells

Abstract

Maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK), a serine/threonine protein kinase, has oncogenic properties and is overexpressed in many cancer cells. The oncogenic function of MELK is attributed to its capacity to disable critical cell-cycle checkpoints and reduce replication stress. Most functional studies have relied on the use of siRNA/shRNA-mediated gene silencing. In the present study, we have explored the biological function of MELK using MELK-T1, a novel and selective small-molecule inhibitor. Strikingly, MELK-T1 triggered a rapid and proteasome-dependent degradation of the MELK protein. Treatment of MCF-7 (Michigan Cancer Foundation-7) breast adenocarcinoma cells with MELK-T1 induced the accumulation of stalled replication forks and double-strand breaks that culminated in a replicative senescence phenotype. This phenotype correlated with a rapid and long-lasting ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) activation and phosphorylation of checkpoint kinase 2 (CHK2). Furthermore, MELK-T1 induced a strong phosphorylation of p53 (cellular tumour antigen p53), a prolonged up-regulation of p21 (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1) and a down-regulation of FOXM1 (Forkhead Box M1) target genes. Our data indicate that MELK is a key stimulator of proliferation by its ability to increase the threshold for DNA-damage tolerance (DDT). Thus, targeting MELK by the inhibition of both its catalytic activity and its protein stability might sensitize tumours to DNA-damaging agents or radiation therapy by lowering the DNA-damage threshold.

Citing Articles

Spatiotemporal regulation of MELK during mitosis.

Majumdar S, Liu S Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1406940.

PMID: 39355119 PMC: 11443572. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1406940.


Targeting MELK in tumor cells and tumor microenvironment: from function and mechanism to therapeutic application.

Su P, Lu Q, Wang Y, Mou Y, Jin W Clin Transl Oncol. 2024; .

PMID: 39187643 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03664-5.


Precision Oncology Comes of Age: Designing Best-in-Class Small Molecules by Integrating Two Decades of Advances in Chemistry, Target Biology, and Data Science.

Stuart D, Guzman-Perez A, Brooijmans N, Jackson E, Kryukov G, Friedman A Cancer Discov. 2023; 13(10):2131-2149.

PMID: 37712571 PMC: 10551669. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-23-0280.


Differential Effects of Overexpression of Wild Type and Kinase-Dead MELK in Fibroblasts and Keratinocytes, Potential Implications for Skin Wound Healing and Cancer.

Szymanski L, Lieto K, Zdanowski R, Lewicki S, Tassan J, Kubiak J Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(9).

PMID: 37175795 PMC: 10179274. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24098089.


Subtype-specific expression of MELK is partly due to copy number alterations in breast cancer.

Hardeman A, Han Y, Grushko T, Mueller J, Gomez M, Zheng Y PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0268693.

PMID: 35749404 PMC: 9231703. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268693.


References
1.
Marie S, Okamoto O, Uno M, Hasegawa A, Oba-Shinjo S, Cohen T . Maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase transcript abundance correlates with malignancy grade in human astrocytomas. Int J Cancer. 2007; 122(4):807-15. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23189. View

2.
Badouel C, Korner R, Frank-Vaillant M, Couturier A, Nigg E, Tassan J . M-phase MELK activity is regulated by MPF and MAPK. Cell Cycle. 2006; 5(8):883-9. DOI: 10.4161/cc.5.8.2683. View

3.
Gray D, Jubb A, Hogue D, Dowd P, Kljavin N, Yi S . Maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase/murine protein serine-threonine kinase 38 is a promising therapeutic target for multiple cancers. Cancer Res. 2005; 65(21):9751-61. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4531. View

4.
Bensimon A, Aebersold R, Shiloh Y . Beyond ATM: the protein kinase landscape of the DNA damage response. FEBS Lett. 2011; 585(11):1625-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.013. View

5.
Bartkova J, Horejsi Z, Koed K, Kramer A, Tort F, Zieger K . DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature. 2005; 434(7035):864-70. DOI: 10.1038/nature03482. View