» Articles » PMID: 26429419

Patient Acceptability of the Yorkshire Dialysis Decision Aid (YoDDA) Booklet: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison Study Across 6 Predialysis Services

Overview
Journal Perit Dial Int
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2015 Oct 3
PMID 26429419
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled:

Background: Patients are satisfied with their kidney care but want more support in making dialysis choices. Predialysis leaflets vary across services, with few being sufficient to enable patients' informed decision making. We describe the acceptability of a patient decision aid and feasibility of evaluating its effectiveness within usual predialysis practice. ♦

Methods: Prospective non-randomized comparison design, Usual Care or Usual Care Plus Yorkshire Dialysis Decision Aid Booklet (+YoDDA), in 6 referral centers (Yorkshire-Humber, UK) for patients with sustained deterioration of kidney function. Consenting (C) patients completed questionnaires after predialysis consultation (T1), and 6 weeks later (T2). Measures assessed YoDDA's utility to support patients' decisions and integration within usual care. ♦

Results: Usual Care (n = 105) and +YoDDA (n = 84) participant characteristics were similar: male (62%), white (94%), age (mean = 62.6; standard deviation [SD] 14.4), kidney disease severity (glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] mean = 14.7; SD 3.7); decisional conflict was < 25; choice-preference for home versus hospital dialysis approximately 50:50. Patients valued receiving YoDDA, reading it on their own (96%), and sharing it with family (72%). The +YoDDA participants had higher scores for understanding kidney disease, reasoning about options, feeling in control, sharing their decision with family. Study engagement varied by center (estimated range 14 - 49%; mean 45%); participants varied in completion of decision quality measures. ♦

Conclusions: Receiving YoDDA as part of predialysis education was valued and useful to patients with worsening kidney disease. Integrating YoDDA actively within predialysis programs will meet clinical guidelines and patient need to support dialysis decision making in the context of patients' lifestyle.

Citing Articles

The integrated care model: facilitating initiation of or transition to home dialysis.

Poinen K, Mitra S, Quinn R Clin Kidney J. 2024; 17(Suppl 1):i13-i20.

PMID: 38846413 PMC: 11151114. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae076.


Decision aids to assist patients and professionals in choosing the right treatment for kidney failure.

Bekker H, Winterbottom A, Gavaruzzi T, Finderup J, Mooney A Clin Kidney J. 2023; 16(Suppl 1):i20-i38.

PMID: 37711634 PMC: 10497379. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad172.


Shared decision-making and planning end-of-life care for patients with end-stage kidney disease: a protocol for developing and testing a complex intervention.

Buur L, Finderup J, Sondergaard H, Kannegaard M, Madsen J, Bekker H Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022; 8(1):226.

PMID: 36195969 PMC: 9533563. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01184-z.


Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review.

Engels N, de Graav G, van der Nat P, van den Dorpel M, Stiggelbout A, Bos W BMJ Open. 2022; 12(9):e055248.

PMID: 36130746 PMC: 9494569. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055248.


Cancer, Fertility and Me: Developing and Testing a Novel Fertility Preservation Patient Decision Aid to Support Women at Risk of Losing Their Fertility Because of Cancer Treatment.

Jones G, Moss R, Darby F, Mahmoodi N, Phillips B, Hughes J Front Oncol. 2022; 12:896939.

PMID: 35847858 PMC: 9280471. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.896939.


References
1.
Brady M, ODonoghue D . Back to the future: changes in the dialysis delivery model in the UK. Perit Dial Int. 2011; 31 Suppl 2:S63-72. DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2010.00102. View

2.
Legare F, Witteman H . Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32(2):276-84. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1078. View

3.
Winterbottom A, Bekker H, Conner M, Mooney A . Patient stories about their dialysis experience biases others' choices regardless of doctor's advice: an experimental study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 27(1):325-31. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr266. View

4.
Wong S, Thornton J, Gbolade B, Bekker H . A randomised controlled trial of a decision-aid leaflet to facilitate women's choice between pregnancy termination methods. BJOG. 2006; 113(6):688-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00930.x. View

5.
Devlin N, Krabbe P . The development of new research methods for the valuation of EQ-5D-5L. Eur J Health Econ. 2013; 14 Suppl 1:S1-3. PMC: 3728454. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-013-0502-3. View