» Articles » PMID: 26425903

The Effect of Radiation Dose and Variation in Neupogen® Initiation Schedule on the Mitigation of Myelosuppression During the Concomitant GI-ARS and H-ARS in a Nonhuman Primate Model of High-dose Exposure with Marrow Sparing

Overview
Journal Health Phys
Date 2015 Oct 2
PMID 26425903
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A nonhuman primate (NHP) model of acute high-dose, partial-body irradiation with 5% bone marrow (PBI/BM5) sparing was used to assess the effect of Neupogen® [granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)] to mitigate the associated myelosuppression when administered at an increasing interval between exposure and initiation of treatment. A secondary objective was to assess the effect of Neupogen® on the mortality or morbidity of the hematopoietic (H)- acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and concurrent acute gastrointestinal radiation syndrome (GI-ARS). NHP were exposed to 10.0 or 11.0 Gy with 6 MV LINAC-derived photons at approximately 0.80 Gy min. All NHP received medical management. NHP were dosed daily with control article (5% dextrose in water) initiated on day 1 post-exposure or Neupogen® (10 μg kg) initiated on day 1, day 3, or day 5 until recovery [absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,000 cells μL for three consecutive days]. Mortality in both the 10.0 Gy and 11.0 Gy cohorts suggested that early administration of Neupogen® at day 1 post exposure may affect acute GI-ARS mortality, while Neupogen® appeared to mitigate mortality due to the H-ARS. However, the study was not powered to detect statistically significant differences in survival. The ability of Neupogen® to stimulate granulopoiesis was assessed by evaluating key parameters for ANC recovery: the depth of nadir, duration of neutropenia (ANC < 500 cells μL) and recovery time to ANC ≥ 1,000 cells μL. Following 10.0 Gy PBI/BM5, the mean duration of neutropenia was 11.6 d in the control cohort vs. 3.5 d and 4.6 d in the day 1 and day 3 Neupogen® cohorts, respectively. The respective ANC nadirs were 94 cells μL, 220 cells μL, and 243 cells μL for the control and day 1 and day 3 Neupogen® cohorts. Following 11.0 Gy PBI/BM5, the duration of neutropenia was 10.9 d in the control cohort vs. 2.8 d, 3.8 d, and 4.5 d in the day 1, day 3, and day 5 Neupogen® cohorts, respectively. The respective ANC nadirs for the control and day 1, day 3, and day 5 Neupogen® cohorts were 131 cells μL, 292 cells μL, 236 cells μL, and 217 cells μL, respectively. Therefore, the acceleration of granulopoiesis by Neupogen® in this model is independent of the time interval between radiation exposure and treatment initiation up to 5 d post-exposure. The PBI/BM5 model can be used to assess medical countermeasure efficacy in the context of the concurrent GI- and H-ARS.

Citing Articles

Multiwell-based G0-PCC assay for radiation biodosimetry.

Royba E, Shuryak I, Ponnaiya B, Repin M, Pampou S, Karan C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19789.

PMID: 39187542 PMC: 11347619. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69243-4.


Effects of combined ciprofloxacin and Neulasta therapy on intestinal pathology and gut microbiota after high-dose irradiation in mice.

Horseman T, Frank A, Cannon G, Zhai M, Olson M, Lin B Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1365161.

PMID: 38807988 PMC: 11130442. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1365161.


Product Development within the National Institutes of Health Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program.

Cassatt D, DiCarlo A, Molinar-Inglis O Radiat Res. 2024; 201(5):471-478.

PMID: 38407357 PMC: 11529828. DOI: 10.1667/RADE-23-00144.1.


The delayed effects of acute radiation exposure (DEARE): characteristics, mechanisms, animal models, and promising medical countermeasures.

Wu T, Orschell C Int J Radiat Biol. 2023; 99(7):1066-1079.

PMID: 36862990 PMC: 10330482. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2023.2187479.


Considerations of Medical Preparedness to Assess and Treat Various Populations During a Radiation Public Health Emergency.

Winters T, Cassatt D, Harrison-Peters J, Hollingsworth B, Rios C, Satyamitra M Radiat Res. 2023; 199(3):301-318.

PMID: 36656560 PMC: 10120400. DOI: 10.1667/RADE-22-00148.1.


References
1.
Monroy R, Skelly R, Taylor P, Dubois A, Donahue R, MacVittie T . Recovery from severe hematopoietic suppression using recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Exp Hematol. 1988; 16(5):344-8. View

2.
Cole L, Haire H, Alpen E . Partial shielding of dogs: effectiveness of small external epicondylar lead cuffs against lethal x-radiation. Radiat Res. 1967; 32(1):54-63. View

3.
Gafter-Gvili A, Fraser A, Paul M, Leibovici L . Meta-analysis: antibiotic prophylaxis reduces mortality in neutropenic patients. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 142(12 Pt 1):979-95. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-12_part_1-200506210-00008. View

4.
FLIEDNER T, Graessle D, Paulsen C, Reimers K . Structure and function of bone marrow hemopoiesis: mechanisms of response to ionizing radiation exposure. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2002; 17(4):405-26. DOI: 10.1089/108497802760363204. View

5.
MacVittie T, Farese A, Bennett A, Gelfond D, Shea-Donohue T, Tudor G . The acute gastrointestinal subsyndrome of the acute radiation syndrome: a rhesus macaque model. Health Phys. 2012; 103(4):411-26. DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31826525f0. View