» Articles » PMID: 26413325

Balloon Dilator Versus Telescopic Metal Dilators for Tract Dilatation During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Stones and Calyceal Stones

Overview
Journal Arab J Urol
Date 2015 Sep 29
PMID 26413325
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the results of balloon dilatation (BD) vs. telescopic metal dilators (TMDs) in establishing the tract for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with calyceal stones or staghorn stones, but with no hydronephrosis.

Patients And Methods: Data from selected patients over 4 years were recorded retrospectively. Patients with complex staghorn stones, an undilated targeted calyx, or the stone filling the targeted calyx, were included in the study. In all, 97 patients were included, of 235 undergoing PCNL between March 2010 and March 2014, and were divided into two groups according to the technique of primary tract dilatation. Group A included patients who had BD and group B those treated using TMDs.

Results: In group A (BD, 55 patients) dilatation was successful in 34 (62%). The dilatation failed or there was a need for re-dilatation using TMD in 21 patients (38%). In one of these 21 patients the dilatation failed due to extravasation. In group B (TMD, 42 patients) dilatation was successful in 38 (90%) patients, with incomplete dilatation and a need for re-dilatation in four (10%) patients, and no failed procedures. Group A had a significantly higher failure rate than group B (P < 0.001). Differences in operative duration, blood loss, stone-removal success rate and complication rate were statistically insignificant.

Conclusion: BD has a higher failure rate than TMD when establishing access for calyceal stones or staghorn stones that have little space around them.

Citing Articles

Preliminary experience with lost mini percutaneous nephrostomy channel retrieval by methylene blue injection.

Xiong L, Kwan K, Xu X, Wei G, Lu Z Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(5):828-832.

PMID: 38855587 PMC: 11157389. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-608.


The use of Alken Metal Telescopic Dilator for 'X-ray-free' PCNL in neglected DJ stent patient: A case report.

Birowo P, Rasyid N Urol Case Rep. 2020; 33:101239.

PMID: 33101989 PMC: 7573760. DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101239.


Optical puncture combined with balloon dilation PCNL vs. conventional puncture dilation PCNL for kidney stones without hydronephrosis: a retrospective study.

Zhou M, He X, Zhang Y, Yu W BMC Urol. 2019; 19(1):122.

PMID: 31775711 PMC: 6882241. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0558-1.


Single-step dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, its safety and efficacy: A prospective, single-center study.

Girisha T, Dev P, Vijaykumar R, Dharwadkar S, Madappa K Urol Ann. 2019; 11(2):171-174.

PMID: 31040603 PMC: 6476215. DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_43_18.


Miniaturisation of PCNL.

Lahme S Urolithiasis. 2017; 46(1):99-106.

PMID: 29243096 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-1029-3.

References
1.
Armitage J, Irving S, Burgess N . Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United kingdom: results of a prospective data registry. Eur Urol. 2012; 61(6):1188-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.003. View

2.
FERNSTROM I, Johansson B . Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976; 10(3):257-9. DOI: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084. View

3.
Tomaszewski J, Smaldone M, Schuster T, Jackman S, Averch T . Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy using balloon dilation in a large contemporary series. J Endourol. 2009; 24(2):207-11. DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0402. View

4.
Kumar V, Keeley Jr F . Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: why do we use rigid dilators?. J Endourol. 2008; 22(9):1877-9. DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.9785. View

5.
Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz N, Bueno Chomon G, Grasso M, Saba P . Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol. 2011; 25(6):933-9. DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0606. View