» Articles » PMID: 24837451

Retreatment After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Computed Tomographic Era: Long-term Follow-up

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 2014 May 20
PMID 24837451
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine the long-term retreatment rates and explore prognostic factors after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the computed tomographic era.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent PCNL with a standardized technique attempting complete fragment detection and clearance by a single surgeon between September 2000 and June 2004 were identified. Through medical record, review details of procedures and outcomes were collected.

Results: A total of 166 renal units in 150 subjects were evaluated. Postoperative computed tomographic scans were conducted in 129 subjects. Median follow-up was 5.4 years (interquartile range, 4.2-6.2 years). Future ipsilateral procedures were performed in 23 renal units (14%) at a median of 2.9 years (interquartile range, 1.7-3.7 years). The cumulative retreatment rate at 7 years for noncalcium stones (24%) was not significantly higher than for calcium-based stones (14%; P = .07). Stone-free renal units had a lower cumulative retreatment rate (4%) than those with residual fragments <2 mm (33%) or ≥2 mm (30%; P = .001). When controlling for residual fragment size, renal units that were composed of uric acid or struvite had an expected hazard rate of retreatment 3.34 times larger than renal units composed of calcium oxalate/phosphate (P = .02) and renal units that were not stone free had an expected hazard rate 7.87 times larger than renal units that were stone free (P = .001).

Conclusion: In this population of complex stone patients treated by PCNL, there appears to be no such thing as an "insignificant fragment." Efforts at initial stone clearance should be maximized.

Citing Articles

Improved display and detection of small renal stones using photon-counting detector CT compared to conventional energy-integrating detector CT.

Esquivel A, Potretzke T, Ferrero A, Inoue A, Hoodeshenans S, Mileto A Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; .

PMID: 39865183 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04781-z.


A single center comparative study of two single use digital flexible ureteroscopy in the management of renal stones less than 2 cm.

Zanaty F, Elshazly M, Kandeel H, Salman B World J Urol. 2023; 41(3):777-782.

PMID: 36700975 PMC: 10082700. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04290-6.


NO Residual Stones after Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones - Update 2021. A Narrative Brief Review.

Geavlete B, Popescu R, Iordache V, Georgescu D, Geavlete P Maedica (Bucur). 2022; 17(3):680-691.

PMID: 36540580 PMC: 9720644. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.3.680.


Future of kidney stone surgery: will we treat small stones with large-sized PCNL and big stones with RIRS?.

Nagele U, Tokas T, Traxer O World J Urol. 2019; 38(12):3291-3292.

PMID: 31628511 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02983-5.


Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography.

Harraz A, Osman Y, El-Nahas A, Elsawy A, Fakhreldin I, Mahmoud O World J Urol. 2016; 35(8):1241-1246.

PMID: 28013344 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1990-4.