» Articles » PMID: 26388724

Gambling on Visual Performance: Neural Correlates of Metacognitive Choice Between Visual Lotteries

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2015 Sep 22
PMID 26388724
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A lottery is a list of mutually exclusive outcomes together with their associated probabilities of occurrence. Decision making is often modeled as choices between lotteries and-in typical research on decision under risk-the probabilities are given to the subject explicitly in numerical form. In this study, we examined lottery decision task where the probabilities of receiving various rewards are contingent on the subjects' own visual performance in a random-dot-motion (RDM) discrimination task, a metacognitive or second order judgment. While there is a large literature concerning the RDM task and there is also a large literature on decision under risk, little is known about metacognitive decisions when the source of uncertainty is visual. Using fMRI with humans, we found distinct fronto-striatal and fronto-parietal networks representing subjects' estimates of his or her performance, reward value, and the expected value (EV) of the lotteries. The fronto-striatal network includes the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and the ventral striatum, involved in reward processing and value-based decision-making. The fronto-parietal network includes the intraparietal sulcus and the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, which was shown to be involved in the accumulation of sensory evidence during visual decision making and in metacognitive judgments on visual performance. These results demonstrate that-while valuation of performance-based lotteries involves a common fronto-striatal valuation network-an additional network unique to the estimation of task-related performance is recruited for the integration of probability and reward information when probability is inferred from visual performance.

Citing Articles

A Common Neural Account for Social and Nonsocial Decisions.

Arabadzhiyska D, Garrod O, Fouragnan E, Luca E, Schyns P, Philiastides M J Neurosci. 2022; 42(48):9030-9044.

PMID: 36280264 PMC: 9732824. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0375-22.2022.


The electrophysiology correlation of the cognitive bias in anxiety under uncertainty.

Yang S, Zhang M, Xu J, Wang L, Li Z, Zou F Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):11354.

PMID: 32647252 PMC: 7347926. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68427-y.


Dynamic combination of sensory and reward information under time pressure.

Farashahi S, Ting C, Kao C, Wu S, Soltani A PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14(3):e1006070.

PMID: 29584717 PMC: 5889192. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006070.

References
1.
Wu S, Delgado M, Maloney L . The neural correlates of subjective utility of monetary outcome and probability weight in economic and in motor decision under risk. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(24):8822-31. PMC: 3156821. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0540-11.2011. View

2.
Clithero J, Rangel A . Informatic parcellation of the network involved in the computation of subjective value. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013; 9(9):1289-302. PMC: 4158359. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst106. View

3.
Padoa-Schioppa C . Neurobiology of economic choice: a good-based model. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011; 34:333-59. PMC: 3273993. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113648. View

4.
Kolling N, Behrens T, Mars R, Rushworth M . Neural mechanisms of foraging. Science. 2012; 336(6077):95-8. PMC: 3440844. DOI: 10.1126/science.1216930. View

5.
Liu T, Pleskac T . Neural correlates of evidence accumulation in a perceptual decision task. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 106(5):2383-98. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00413.2011. View