» Articles » PMID: 26386178

Use of Alternative Assays to Identify and Prioritize Organophosphorus Flame Retardants for Potential Developmental and Neurotoxicity

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Toxicology
Date 2015 Sep 20
PMID 26386178
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to their toxicity and persistence in the environment, brominated flame retardants (BFRs) are being phased out of commercial use, leading to the increased use of alternative chemicals such as the organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs). There is, however, limited information on the potential health effects of OPFRs. Due to the structural similarity of the OPFRs to organophosphorus insecticides, there is concern regarding developmental toxicity and neurotoxicity. In response, we evaluated a set of OPFRs (triphenyl phosphate [TPHP]), isopropylated phenyl phosphate [IPP], 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate [EHDP], tert-butylated phenyl diphenyl phosphate [BPDP], trimethyl phenyl phosphate [TMPP], isodecyl diphenyl phosphate [IDDP], (tris(1,3-dichloroisopropyl) phosphate [TDCIPP], and tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphate [TCEP]) in a battery of cell-based in vitro assays and alternative model organisms and compared the results to those obtained for two classical BFRs (3,3',5,5'-tetrabromobisphenol A [TBBPA] and 2,2'4,4'-brominated diphenyl ether [BDE-47]). The assays used evaluated the effects of chemicals on the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells, the proliferation and growth of human neural stem cells, rat neuronal growth and network activity, and development of nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans) and zebrafish (Danio rerio). All assays were performed in a concentration-response format, allowing for the determination of the point of departure (POD: the lowest concentration where a chemically-induced response exceeds background noise). The majority of OPFRs (8/9) were active in multiple assays in the range of 1-10 μM, most of which had comparable activity to the BFRs TBBPA and BDE-47. TCEP was negative in all assays. The results indicate that the replacement OPFRs, with the exception of TCEP, showed comparable activity to the two BFRs in the assays tested. Based on these results, more comprehensive studies are warranted to further characterize the potential hazard of some of these OPFR compounds.

Citing Articles

Inferring atmospheric sources of gaseous organophosphate esters from spatial patterns.

Li Y, Zhan F, Shunthirasingham C, Lei Y, Oh J, Weng C Environ Toxicol Chem. 2025; 44(3):643-652.

PMID: 39913418 PMC: 11864208. DOI: 10.1093/etojnl/vgae089.


Machine Learning Models for Predicting Bioavailability of Traditional and Emerging Aromatic Contaminants in Plant Roots.

Li S, Shen Y, Gao M, Song H, Ge Z, Zhang Q Toxics. 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39453157 PMC: 11511036. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12100737.


Occurrence, Bioaccumulation, and Risk Assessment of Organophosphate Esters in Rivers Receiving Different Effluents.

Da S, Wang J Toxics. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39195714 PMC: 11359139. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12080612.


Investigation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Genes as Requirements for Visual Startle Response Hyperactivity in Larval Zebrafish Exposed to Structurally Similar Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).

Gutsfeld S, Wehmas L, Omoyeni I, Schweiger N, Leuthold D, Michaelis P Environ Health Perspect. 2024; 132(7):77007.

PMID: 39046251 PMC: 11268134. DOI: 10.1289/EHP13667.


Update of the scientific opinion on tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and its derivatives in food.

Schrenk D, Bignami M, Bodin L, Chipman J, Del Mazo J, Grasl-Kraupp B EFSA J. 2024; 22(7):e8859.

PMID: 39010865 PMC: 11247339. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8859.