» Articles » PMID: 26348994

Scale Matters: A Cost-Outcome Analysis of an M-Health Intervention in Malawi

Overview
Date 2015 Sep 9
PMID 26348994
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The primary objectives of this study are to determine cost per user and cost per contact with users of a mobile health (m-health) intervention. The secondary objectives are to map costs to changes in maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) and to estimate costs of alternate implementation and usage scenarios.

Materials And Methods: A base cost model, constructed from recurrent costs and selected capital costs, was used to estimate average cost per user and per contact of an m-health intervention. This model was mapped to statistically significant changes in MNCH intermediate outcomes to determine the cost of improvements in MNCH indicators. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to estimate costs in alternate scenarios.

Results: The m-health intervention cost $29.33 per user and $4.33 per successful contact. The average cost for each user experiencing a change in an MNCH indicator ranged from $67 to $355. The sensitivity analyses showed that cost per user could be reduced by 48% if the service were to operate at full capacity.

Conclusions: We believe that the intervention, operating at scale, has potential to be a cost-effective method for improving maternal and child health indicators.

Citing Articles

Appraising eHealth Investment for Africa: Scoping Review and Development of a Framework.

Broomhead S, Mars M, Scott R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(10).

PMID: 39457250 PMC: 11507607. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21101277.


Availability of published evidence on coverage, cost components, and funding support for digitalisation of infectious disease surveillance in Africa, 2003-2022: a systematic review.

Kaburi B, Harries M, Hauri A, Kenu E, Wyss K, Silenou B BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1731.

PMID: 38943132 PMC: 11214246. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19205-2.


The effect of mHealth on childhood vaccination in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gilano G, Sako S, Molla B, Dekker A, Fijten R PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0294442.

PMID: 38381753 PMC: 10880990. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294442.


Development and evaluation of a culturally adapted digital-platform integrated multifaceted intervention to promote the utilization of maternal healthcare services: a single-arm pilot study.

Xu J, Akezhuoli H, Zhou M, Yao T, Lu J, Wang X Int J Equity Health. 2023; 22(1):217.

PMID: 37848902 PMC: 10583400. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-02033-y.


A cost analysis of implementing mobile health facilitated tuberculosis contact investigation in a low-income setting.

Turimumahoro P, Tucker A, Gupta A, Tampi R, Babirye D, Ochom E PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0265033.

PMID: 35363783 PMC: 8975098. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265033.


References
1.
Drummond M, Weatherly H, Ferguson B . Economic evaluation of health interventions. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1204. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1204. View

2.
Kaewkungwal J, Singhasivanon P, Khamsiriwatchara A, Sawang S, Meankaew P, Wechsart A . Application of smart phone in "Better Border Healthcare Program": a module for mother and child care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010; 10:69. PMC: 2989931. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-69. View

3.
Schweitzer J, Synowiec C . The economics of eHealth and mHealth. J Health Commun. 2012; 17 Suppl 1:73-81. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2011.649158. View

4.
Tamrat T, Kachnowski S . Special delivery: an analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Matern Child Health J. 2011; 16(5):1092-101. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0836-3. View

5.
Aranda-Jan C, Mohutsiwa-Dibe N, Loukanova S . Systematic review on what works, what does not work and why of implementation of mobile health (mHealth) projects in Africa. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:188. PMC: 3942265. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-188. View