» Articles » PMID: 26340990

Sympatric Speciation Revealed by Genome-wide Divergence in the Blind Mole Rat Spalax

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Sep 6
PMID 26340990
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sympatric speciation (SS), i.e., speciation within a freely breeding population or in contiguous populations, was first proposed by Darwin [Darwin C (1859) On the Origins of Species by Means of Natural Selection] and is still controversial despite theoretical support [Gavrilets S (2004) Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species (MPB-41)] and mounting empirical evidence. Speciation of subterranean mammals generally, including the genus Spalax, was considered hitherto allopatric, whereby new species arise primarily through geographic isolation. Here we show in Spalax a case of genome-wide divergence analysis in mammals, demonstrating that SS in continuous populations, with gene flow, encompasses multiple widespread genomic adaptive complexes, associated with the sharply divergent ecologies. The two abutting soil populations of S. galili in northern Israel habituate the ancestral Senonian chalk population and abutting derivative Plio-Pleistocene basalt population. Population divergence originated ∼0.2-0.4 Mya based on both nuclear and mitochondrial genome analyses. Population structure analysis displayed two distinctly divergent clusters of chalk and basalt populations. Natural selection has acted on 300+ genes across the genome, diverging Spalax chalk and basalt soil populations. Gene ontology enrichment analysis highlights strong but differential soil population adaptive complexes: in basalt, sensory perception, musculature, metabolism, and energetics, and in chalk, nutrition and neurogenetics are outstanding. Population differentiation of chemoreceptor genes suggests intersoil population's mate and habitat choice substantiating SS. Importantly, distinctions in protein degradation may also contribute to SS. Natural selection and natural genetic engineering [Shapiro JA (2011) Evolution: A View From the 21st Century] overrule gene flow, evolving divergent ecological adaptive complexes. Sharp ecological divergences abound in nature; therefore, SS appears to be an important mode of speciation as first envisaged by Darwin [Darwin C (1859) On the Origins of Species by Means of Natural Selection].

Citing Articles

Whole-genome resequencing reveals genetic diversity, differentiation, and selection signatures of yak breeds/populations in southwestern China.

Zhang S, Li J, Zhao Y, Tang Y, Li H, Song T Front Genet. 2024; 15:1382128.

PMID: 38873117 PMC: 11169580. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1382128.


Genomic analysis of Tibetan ground tits identifies molecular adaptations associated with cooperative breeding.

Wang Y, Wang C, Hong W, Tian S, Lu Q, Wang B Curr Zool. 2023; 69(5):620-630.

PMID: 37637321 PMC: 10449426. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoac067.


Sympatric Speciation in Mole Rats and Wild Barley and Their Genome Repeatome Evolution: A Commentary.

Nevo E, Li K Adv Genet (Hoboken). 2023; 3(4):2200009.

PMID: 36911292 PMC: 9993473. DOI: 10.1002/ggn2.202200009.


Sympatric or micro-allopatric speciation in a glacial lake? Genomic islands support neither.

Sun N, Yang L, Tian F, Zeng H, He Z, Zhao K Natl Sci Rev. 2023; 9(12):nwac291.

PMID: 36778108 PMC: 9905650. DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwac291.


Genomic divergence between two sister species through linked selection and recombination.

Zhang J, Zhang S, Zheng Z, Lu Z, Yang Y Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(12):e9611.

PMID: 36540075 PMC: 9754895. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9611.


References
1.
Hudson R . A new statistic for detecting genetic differentiation. Genetics. 2000; 155(4):2011-4. PMC: 1461195. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/155.4.2011. View

2.
Reich D, Cargill M, Bolk S, Ireland J, Sabeti P, Richter D . Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Nature. 2001; 411(6834):199-204. DOI: 10.1038/35075590. View

3.
Watterson G . On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975; 7(2):256-76. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. View

4.
Adkins R, Walton A, Honeycutt R . Higher-level systematics of rodents and divergence time estimates based on two congruent nuclear genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003; 26(3):409-20. DOI: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00304-4. View

5.
Dennis Jr G, Sherman B, Hosack D, Yang J, Gao W, Lane H . DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 2003; 4(5):P3. View