» Articles » PMID: 23704889

Improvements to Robotics-inspired Conformational Sampling in Rosetta

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 May 25
PMID 23704889
Citations 112
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To accurately predict protein conformations in atomic detail, a computational method must be capable of sampling models sufficiently close to the native structure. All-atom sampling is difficult because of the vast number of possible conformations and extremely rugged energy landscapes. Here, we test three sampling strategies to address these difficulties: conformational diversification, intensification of torsion and omega-angle sampling and parameter annealing. We evaluate these strategies in the context of the robotics-based kinematic closure (KIC) method for local conformational sampling in Rosetta on an established benchmark set of 45 12-residue protein segments without regular secondary structure. We quantify performance as the fraction of sub-Angstrom models generated. While improvements with individual strategies are only modest, the combination of intensification and annealing strategies into a new "next-generation KIC" method yields a four-fold increase over standard KIC in the median percentage of sub-Angstrom models across the dataset. Such improvements enable progress on more difficult problems, as demonstrated on longer segments, several of which could not be accurately remodeled with previous methods. Given its improved sampling capability, next-generation KIC should allow advances in other applications such as local conformational remodeling of multiple segments simultaneously, flexible backbone sequence design, and development of more accurate energy functions.

Citing Articles

Conformational dynamics in specialized CH zinc finger domains enable zinc-responsive gene repression in S. pombe.

Wadhwa V, Jamshidi C, Stachowski K, Bird A, Foster M Protein Sci. 2025; 34(2):e70044.

PMID: 39865413 PMC: 11761706. DOI: 10.1002/pro.70044.


How pairs of insertion mutations impact protein structure: an exhaustive computational study.

Li C, Zheng Y, Jagodzinski F Bioinform Adv. 2024; 4(1):vbae138.

PMID: 39678205 PMC: 11639182. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbae138.


Dynamic Mechanism for Subtype Selectivity of Endocannabinoids.

Dutta S, Zhao L, Shukla D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39554065 PMC: 11565827. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.25.620304.


Structure-Based Computational Scanning of Chemical Modification Sites in Biologics.

Thomas N, Sanyal T, Greisen Jr P, Deibler K ACS Omega. 2024; 9(34):36787-36794.

PMID: 39220547 PMC: 11360052. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c05857.


Highly Accurate and Efficient Deep Learning Paradigm for Full-Atom Protein Loop Modeling with KarmaLoop.

Wang T, Zhang X, Zhang O, Chen G, Pan P, Wang E Research (Wash D C). 2024; 7:0408.

PMID: 39055686 PMC: 11268956. DOI: 10.34133/research.0408.


References
1.
Das R . Four small puzzles that Rosetta doesn't solve. PLoS One. 2011; 6(5):e20044. PMC: 3098862. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020044. View

2.
Fleishman S, Leaver-Fay A, Corn J, Strauch E, Khare S, Koga N . RosettaScripts: a scripting language interface to the Rosetta macromolecular modeling suite. PLoS One. 2011; 6(6):e20161. PMC: 3123292. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020161. View

3.
Das R, Baker D . Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008; 77:363-82. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062906.171838. View

4.
Bradley P, Misura K, Baker D . Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science. 2005; 309(5742):1868-71. DOI: 10.1126/science.1113801. View

5.
Tyka M, Jung K, Baker D . Efficient sampling of protein conformational space using fast loop building and batch minimization on highly parallel computers. J Comput Chem. 2012; 33(31):2483-91. PMC: 3760475. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23069. View