» Articles » PMID: 26328106

How Should Prostate Specific Antigen Be Interpreted?

Overview
Journal Turk J Urol
Publisher Aves
Date 2015 Sep 2
PMID 26328106
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since from its clinical introduction to the present time, measurement of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level is one of the most widely used tests in urology practice. Initially, the upper limit for PSA was 4 ng/mL, but today, a reduction for the upper limit is recommended to 2.5-3 ng/mL for patients between 60 and 65 years of age and younger. On the use of PSA as a screening test for prostate cancer, there are differences of opinion. However, it is a recommended test in the evaluation and monitoring of the risky group for prostate cancer. In conclusion PSA test should be performed at appropriate intervals for appropriate people with an appropriate age, after informing the patient about the test in detail.

Citing Articles

Nucleic Acid Aptamer-Based Biosensors: A Review.

Sequeira-Antunes B, Ferreira H Biomedicines. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38137422 PMC: 10741014. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11123201.


Prostatic Artery Embolization as a Treatment Option for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results from the Prospective Follow-Up Study in Lithuania.

Jankauskas T, Burzinskis E, Kaupas R, Basevicius A, Jievaltas M Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(10).

PMID: 37893589 PMC: 10608601. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59101871.


Breviscapine Participates in the Progression of Prostate Cancer by Inhibiting ZFP91 Expression through Upregulation of MicroRNA-129-5p.

Yang J, Jin W, Zhang X, Chang P, Zheng D Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021; 2021:1511607.

PMID: 34925523 PMC: 8674053. DOI: 10.1155/2021/1511607.


Multiparametric prostatic MRI should not be the only method to decide re-biopsy in the patients who had a negative prostatic biopsy.

Atan A Int Urol Nephrol. 2019; 51(10):1781-1782.

PMID: 31289982 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02227-w.


Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography with Tc-99m MDP bone scan in prostate cancer patients.

Uslu-Besli L, Sager S, Akgun E, Asa S, Sahin O, Demirdag C Turk J Med Sci. 2019; 49(1):301-310.

PMID: 30761859 PMC: 7350868. DOI: 10.3906/sag-1807-4.


References
1.
Mouraviev V, Madden J . Focal therapy for prostate cancer: pathologic basis. Curr Opin Urol. 2009; 19(2):161-7. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328323f62b. View

2.
Stamey T, Yang N, Hay A, McNeal J, Freiha F, Redwine E . Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317(15):909-16. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198710083171501. View

3.
Kawachi M, Bahnson R, Barry M, Busby J, Carroll P, Carter H . NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer early detection. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010; 8(2):240-62. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0016. View

4.
van Renterghem K, Van Koeveringe G, Achten R, Van Kerrebroeck P . A new algorithm in patients with elevated and/or rising prostate-specific antigen level, minor lower urinary tract symptoms, and negative multisite prostate biopsies. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009; 42(1):29-38. PMC: 2844972. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-009-9596-z. View

5.
Venderbos L, Roobol M . PSA-based prostate cancer screening: the role of active surveillance and informed and shared decision making. Asian J Androl. 2011; 13(2):219-24. PMC: 3739214. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2010.180. View