» Articles » PMID: 26295940

A Complex Network Approach to Distributional Semantic Models

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Aug 22
PMID 26295940
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A number of studies on network analysis have focused on language networks based on free word association, which reflects human lexical knowledge, and have demonstrated the small-world and scale-free properties in the word association network. Nevertheless, there have been very few attempts at applying network analysis to distributional semantic models, despite the fact that these models have been studied extensively as computational or cognitive models of human lexical knowledge. In this paper, we analyze three network properties, namely, small-world, scale-free, and hierarchical properties, of semantic networks created by distributional semantic models. We demonstrate that the created networks generally exhibit the same properties as word association networks. In particular, we show that the distribution of the number of connections in these networks follows the truncated power law, which is also observed in an association network. This indicates that distributional semantic models can provide a plausible model of lexical knowledge. Additionally, the observed differences in the network properties of various implementations of distributional semantic models are consistently explained or predicted by considering the intrinsic semantic features of a word-context matrix and the functions of matrix weighting and smoothing. Furthermore, to simulate a semantic network with the observed network properties, we propose a new growing network model based on the model of Steyvers and Tenenbaum. The idea underlying the proposed model is that both preferential and random attachments are required to reflect different types of semantic relations in network growth process. We demonstrate that this model provides a better explanation of network behaviors generated by distributional semantic models.

Citing Articles

Feature-rich multiplex lexical networks reveal mental strategies of early language learning.

Citraro S, Vitevitch M, Stella M, Rossetti G Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1474.

PMID: 36702869 PMC: 9879964. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-27029-6.


Brands, networks, communities: How brand names are wired in the mind.

Kovacs L, Bota A, Hajdu L, Kresz M PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0273192.

PMID: 36006965 PMC: 9409517. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273192.


Structure of communities in semantic networks of biomedical research on disparities in health and sexism.

Rivera-Romano L, Juarez-Cano G, Hernandez-Lemus E, Vallejo M, Martinez-Garcia M Biomedica. 2020; 40(4):702-721.

PMID: 33275349 PMC: 7808772. DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.5182.


Architecture and evolution of semantic networks in mathematics texts.

Christianson N, Blevins A, Bassett D Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020; 476(2239):20190741.

PMID: 32821238 PMC: 7426037. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0741.


Modeling the Structure and Dynamics of Semantic Processing.

Rotaru A, Vigliocco G, Frank S Cogn Sci. 2018; 42(8):2890-2917.

PMID: 30294932 PMC: 6585957. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12690.


References
1.
Lerner A, Ogrocki P, Thomas P . Network graph analysis of category fluency testing. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2009; 22(1):45-52. DOI: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e318192ccaf. View

2.
Ferrer I Cancho R, Sole R . The small world of human language. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1482):2261-5. PMC: 1088874. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1800. View

3.
Louwerse M . Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Top Cogn Sci. 2014; 3(2):273-302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x. View

4.
Kenett Y, Kenett D, Ben-Jacob E, Faust M . Global and local features of semantic networks: evidence from the Hebrew mental lexicon. PLoS One. 2011; 6(8):e23912. PMC: 3161081. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023912. View

5.
De Deyne S, Storms G . Word associations: network and semantic properties. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(1):213-31. DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.1.213. View