» Articles » PMID: 26248872

Nanoparticles and Clinically Applicable Cell Tracking

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Aug 8
PMID 26248872
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In vivo cell tracking has emerged as a much sought after tool for design and monitoring of cell-based treatment strategies. Various techniques are available for pre-clinical animal studies, from which much has been learned and still can be learned. However, there is also a need for clinically translatable techniques. Central to in vivo cell imaging is labelling of cells with agents that can give rise to signals in vivo, that can be detected and measured non-invasively. The current imaging technology of choice for clinical translation is MRI in combination with labelling of cells with magnetic agents. The main challenge encountered during the cell labelling procedure is to efficiently incorporate the label into the cell, such that the labelled cells can be imaged at high sensitivity for prolonged periods of time, without the labelling process affecting the functionality of the cells. In this respect, nanoparticles offer attractive features since their structure and chemical properties can be modified to facilitate cellular incorporation and because they can carry a high payload of the relevant label into cells. While these technologies have already been applied in clinical trials and have increased the understanding of cell-based therapy mechanism, many challenges are still faced.

Citing Articles

Counting cells in motion by quantitative real-time magnetic particle imaging.

Remmo A, Kosch O, Kampen L, Ludwig A, Wiekhorst F, Lowa N Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4253.

PMID: 38378785 PMC: 10879211. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54784-5.


Non-radioactive imaging strategies for immune cell tracking.

Kiraga L, Kucharzewska P, Strzemecki D, Rygiel T, Krol M Phys Sci Rev. 2023; 8(3):385-403.

PMID: 36975764 PMC: 10037928. DOI: 10.1515/psr-2020-0205.


Cell Tracking by Magnetic Particle Imaging: Methodology for Labeling THP-1 Monocytes with Magnetic Nanoparticles for Cellular Imaging.

Remmo A, Lowa N, Kosch O, Eberbeck D, Ludwig A, Kampen L Cells. 2022; 11(18).

PMID: 36139467 PMC: 9496715. DOI: 10.3390/cells11182892.


Analysis of cell-nanoparticle interactions and imaging of labeled cells showing barcorded endosomes using fluorescent thiol-organosilica nanoparticles surface-functionalized with polyethyleneimine.

Nakamura M, Nakamura J, Mochizuki C, Kuroda C, Kato S, Haruta T Nanoscale Adv. 2022; 4(12):2682-2703.

PMID: 36132282 PMC: 9417756. DOI: 10.1039/d1na00839k.


Nanotechnology-Assisted Cell Tracking.

Peserico A, Di Berardino C, Russo V, Capacchietti G, Di Giacinto O, Canciello A Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 35564123 PMC: 9103829. DOI: 10.3390/nano12091414.


References
1.
Kim T, Momin E, Choi J, Yuan K, Zaidi H, Kim J . Mesoporous silica-coated hollow manganese oxide nanoparticles as positive T1 contrast agents for labeling and MRI tracking of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2011; 133(9):2955-61. PMC: 3048840. DOI: 10.1021/ja1084095. View

2.
Wang Y, Xu C, Ow H . Commercial nanoparticles for stem cell labeling and tracking. Theranostics. 2013; 3(8):544-60. PMC: 3741604. DOI: 10.7150/thno.5634. View

3.
Liang Y, Walczak P, Bulte J . The survival of engrafted neural stem cells within hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2013; 34(22):5521-9. PMC: 3653424. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.095. View

4.
Siglienti I, Bendszus M, Kleinschnitz C, Stoll G . Cytokine profile of iron-laden macrophages: implications for cellular magnetic resonance imaging. J Neuroimmunol. 2005; 173(1-2):166-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.11.011. View

5.
Bulte J . Science to practice: can stem cells be labeled inside the body instead of outside?. Radiology. 2013; 269(1):1-3. PMC: 5432207. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13131753. View