» Articles » PMID: 26240371

Essential Role for Polymerase Specialization in Cellular Nonhomologous End Joining

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Aug 5
PMID 26240371
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) repairs chromosome breaks and must remain effective in the face of extensive diversity in broken end structures. We show here that this flexibility is often reliant on the ability to direct DNA synthesis across strand breaks, and that polymerase (Pol) μ and Pol λ are the only mammalian DNA polymerases that have this activity. By systematically varying substrate in cells, we show each polymerase is uniquely proficient in different contexts. The templating nucleotide is also selected differently, with Pol μ using the unpaired base adjacent to the downstream 5' phosphate even when there are available template sites further upstream of this position; this makes Pol μ more flexible but also less accurate than Pol λ. Loss of either polymerase alone consequently has clear and distinguishable effects on the fidelity of repair, but end remodeling by cellular nucleases and the remaining polymerase helps mitigate the effects on overall repair efficiency. Accordingly, when cells are deficient in both polymerases there is synergistic impact on NHEJ efficiency, both in terms of repair of defined substrates and cellular resistance to ionizing radiation. Pol μ and Pol λ thus provide distinct solutions to a problem for DNA synthesis that is unique to this pathway and play a key role in conferring on NHEJ the flexibility required for accurate and efficient repair.

Citing Articles

The interplay of DNA repair context with target sequence predictably biases Cas9-generated mutations.

Pallaseni A, Peets E, Girling G, Crepaldi L, Kuzmin I, Moor M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10271.

PMID: 39592573 PMC: 11599590. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54566-7.


DNA repair and anti-cancer mechanisms in the long-lived bowhead whale.

Firsanov D, Zacher M, Tian X, Sformo T, Zhao Y, Tombline G bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39574710 PMC: 11580846. DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.07.539748.


Current Strategies for Increasing Knock-In Efficiency in CRISPR/Cas9-Based Approaches.

Leal A, Herreno-Pachon A, Benincore-Florez E, Karunathilaka A, Tomatsu S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(5).

PMID: 38473704 PMC: 10931195. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052456.


DNA polymerase λ Loop1 variant yields unexpected gain-of-function capabilities in nonhomologous end-joining.

Kaminski A, Chiruvella K, Ramsden D, Bebenek K, Kunkel T, Pedersen L DNA Repair (Amst). 2024; 136:103645.

PMID: 38428373 PMC: 11078337. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103645.


For the Better or for the Worse? The Effect of Manganese on the Activity of Eukaryotic DNA Polymerases.

Balint E, Unk I Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(1).

PMID: 38203535 PMC: 10779026. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25010363.


References
1.
Dominguez O, Ruiz J, Lain de Lera T, Garcia-Diaz M, Gonzalez M, Kirchhoff T . DNA polymerase mu (Pol mu), homologous to TdT, could act as a DNA mutator in eukaryotic cells. EMBO J. 2000; 19(7):1731-42. PMC: 310241. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/19.7.1731. View

2.
Benedict C, Gilfillan S, Thai T, Kearney J . Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and repertoire development. Immunol Rev. 2000; 175:150-7. View

3.
Aoufouchi S, Flatter E, Dahan A, Faili A, Bertocci B, Storck S . Two novel human and mouse DNA polymerases of the polX family. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28(18):3684-93. PMC: 110747. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.18.3684. View

4.
Delarue M, Boule J, Lescar J, Jourdan N, Sukumar N, Rougeon F . Crystal structures of a template-independent DNA polymerase: murine terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase. EMBO J. 2002; 21(3):427-39. PMC: 125842. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/21.3.427. View

5.
Garcia-Diaz M, Bebenek K, Krahn J, Kunkel T, Pedersen L . A closed conformation for the Pol lambda catalytic cycle. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004; 12(1):97-8. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb876. View