» Articles » PMID: 26233032

Spatial Release from Masking in Children with Bilateral Cochlear Implants and with Normal Hearing: Effect of Target-interferer Similarity

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2015 Aug 3
PMID 26233032
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In complex auditory environments, it is often difficult to separate a target talker from interfering speech. For normal hearing (NH) adult listeners, similarity between the target and interfering speech leads to increased difficulty in separating them; that is, informational masking occurs due to confusability of the target and interferers. This study investigated performance of children with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) when target and interferers were either same-sex (male) talkers, or different-sex talkers (male target, female interferer). Comparisons between children with BiCIs and NH, when matched for age, were also conducted. Speech intelligibility was measured for target and interferers spatially co-located, or spatially separated with the interferers positioned symmetrically (+90° and -90°) or asymmetrically (both at +90°, right). Spatial release from masking (SRM) was computed as the difference between co-located and separated conditions. Within group BiCI comparisons revealed that in the co-located condition speech intelligibility was worse with the same-sex vs different-sex stimuli. There was also a trend for more SRM with the same-sex vs different-sex stimuli. When comparing BiCI to NH listeners, SRM was larger for the NH groups, suggesting that NH children are better able to make use of spatial cues to improve speech understanding in noise.

Citing Articles

Teenagers and Young Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Study Approach and Baseline Characteristics.

Lofkvist U, Dahlby-Skoog M, Persson A, Asp F, Verrecchia L, Gripenberg S Audiol Res. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39997160 PMC: 11851589. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15010016.


Empathy Development in Preschoolers With/Without Hearing Loss and Its Associations with Social-Emotional Functioning.

Li Z, Li B, Tsou Y, Frijns J, Meng Q, Yuen S Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024; 53(2):179-192.

PMID: 39652274 PMC: 11845562. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-024-01271-0.


Impact of Reverberation on Speech Perception in Noise in Bimodal/Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users with and without Residual Hearing.

Konig C, Baumann U, Stover T, Weissgerber T J Clin Med. 2024; 13(17).

PMID: 39274482 PMC: 11396047. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175269.


Speech Recognition and Spatial Hearing in Young Adults With Down Syndrome: Relationships With Hearing Thresholds and Auditory Working Memory.

Anshu K, Kristensen K, Godar S, Zhou X, Hartley S, Litovsky R Ear Hear. 2024; 45(6):1568-1584.

PMID: 39090791 PMC: 11493531. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001549.


Children's use of spatial and visual cues for release from perceptual masking.

Lalonde K, Peng Z, Halverson D, Dwyer G J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 155(2):1559-1569.

PMID: 38393738 PMC: 10890829. DOI: 10.1121/10.0024766.


References
1.
DE Jong N, Wempe T . Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(2):385-90. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.385. View

2.
Hawley M, Litovsky R, Colburn H . Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 105(6):3436-48. DOI: 10.1121/1.424670. View

3.
Wightman F, Kistler D, OBryan A . Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 128(1):270-9. PMC: 2921429. DOI: 10.1121/1.3436536. View

4.
Van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Wouters J . Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2010; 31(5):702-13. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e40dfe. View

5.
Li T, Fu Q . Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol. 2011; 50(8):498-502. PMC: 3580215. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.576274. View