» Articles » PMID: 26229265

Comparative in Vitro SEM Study of a Novel Root Canal Irrigant-MTAD and Conventional Root Biomodifiers on Periodontally Involved Human Teeth

Overview
Date 2015 Aug 1
PMID 26229265
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Smear layer removal and collagen fiber exposure may improve regeneration which can be accomplished by use of root biomodifiers. These enhance the degree of connective tissue attachment to denuded roots. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare novel root canal irrigant and other root biomodifiers for smear layer removal on periodontally involved human teeth.

Materials And Methods: Forty human teeth were collected and stored in saline. After scaling and root planing, two samples were obtained from each tooth. Thus, a total of 80 dentin blocks were randomly divided into four groups: Mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent (MTAD), tetracycline hydrochloride (TTC HCl), citric acid (CA), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The agents were applied for 3 min by active burnishing. Immediately following treatment, the specimens were rinsed, dehydrated, fixed and prepared for scanning electron microscope and were examined at × 3500 magnification. Sampaio's index was evaluated by the previously trained blind examiner using photomicrographs. Groups were compared using analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post-hoc test.

Results: Mixture of tetracycline, acid, and detergent is most efficacious in removing the smear layer and showed statistically significant dentinal tubules opening, followed by EDTA, TTC HCl, and CA.

Conclusion: Mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent and conventional root biomodifiers used in the study alters the dentin surface by smear layer removal and exposure of dentinal tubules. Hence, MTAD as a root biomodifier may have a significant role in periodontal regeneration.

References
1.
Hanes P, Polson A, Ladenheim S . Cell and fiber attachment to demineralized dentin from normal root surfaces. J Periodontol. 1985; 56(12):752-65. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1985.56.12.752. View

2.
Isik A, Tarim B, Hafez A, Yalcin F, Onan U, Cox C . A comparative scanning electron microscopic study on the characteristics of demineralized dentin root surface using different tetracycline HCl concentrations and application times. J Periodontol. 2000; 71(2):219-25. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.2.219. View

3.
Sampaio J, Theodoro L, Correa M, Mendes A . A comparative SEM study of smear layer removal by detergents and EDTA on the root surface. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 25(2):157-63. View

4.
Garrett J, Crigger M, Egelberg J . Effects of citric acid on diseased root surfaces. J Periodontal Res. 1978; 13(2):155-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1978.tb00164.x. View

5.
Polson A, Frederick G, Ladenheim S, Hanes P . The production of a root surface smear layer by instrumentation and its removal by citric acid. J Periodontol. 1984; 55(8):443-6. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1984.55.8.443. View