» Articles » PMID: 15107913

Effectiveness of EDTA and EDTA-T Brushing on the Removal of Root Surface Smear Layer

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2004 Apr 27
PMID 15107913
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the removal of root surface smear layer following active application of EDTA gel and EDTA-T (texapon) gel in different concentrations (5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 24%), using scanning electron microscopy. A total of 220 dentin blocks obtained from the root surfaces of extracted teeth were divided into 3 groups: Group I - (control) application of saline solution (n = 20); Group II - EDTA gel (pH 7.0) was applied in the following concentrations: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 24% (n = 100); Group III - EDTA-T gel (pH 7.0) applied in the same concentrations described above (n = 100). The photomicrographs were evaluated by one calibrated examiner using a smear layer removal index and following statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis test). The results demonstrated that the specimens treated with EDTA and EDTA-T gel presented a better smear layer removal than the control group (p < 0.01); no statistically significant differences were observed between the EDTA and EDTA-T groups and between the concentrations tested (Mann-Whitney, p > 0.05). Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that all treatment modalities effectively removed the smear layer from the root surface. The addition of texapon into the EDTA gel formulation did not increase its effectiveness.

Citing Articles

Comparative in vitro SEM study of a novel root canal irrigant-MTAD and conventional root biomodifiers on periodontally involved human teeth.

Tandon C, Govila V, Pant V, Meenawat A J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015; 19(3):268-72.

PMID: 26229265 PMC: 4520109. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.154192.


Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning: a scanning electron microscopy.

Amaral N, de Rezende M, Hirata F, Rodrigues M, Santana A, Greghi S J Appl Oral Sci. 2011; 19(5):469-75.

PMID: 21986651 PMC: 3984192. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000500006.