» Articles » PMID: 26228575

Hyperactivation to Pleasant Interoceptive Stimuli Characterizes the Transition to Stimulant Addiction

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2015 Aug 1
PMID 26228575
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Altered interoception, how the brain processes afferents from the body, may contribute to the urge to take drugs, and subsequently, the development of addiction. Although chronic stimulant dependent individuals exhibit attenuated brain responses to pleasant interoceptive stimuli, it is unclear whether this deficit exists early-on in the process of transition to stimulant addiction.

Methods: To this end, we compared problem stimulant users (PSU; n=18), desisted stimulant users (DSU; n=15), and stimulant naïve comparison subjects (CTL; n=15) during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while they anticipated and experienced pleasant soft touch (slow brushstroke to the palm and forearm).

Results: Groups did not differ in behavioral performance or visual analog scale ratings of soft touch stimuli. fMRI results indicated that PSU exhibited greater right anterior insula, left inferior frontal gyrus, and right superior frontal gyrus activation than DSU and CTL during the anticipation and experience of soft touch. Moreover, during the experience of soft touch, PSU demonstrated higher bilateral precentral gyrus/middle insula and right posterior temporal gyrus activation than DSU and CTL.

Conclusions: In contrast to chronic stimulant dependence, individuals who have recently developed stimulant use disorders show exaggerated neural processing of pleasant interoceptive stimuli. Thus, increased processing of body-relevant information signaling pleasant touch in those individuals who develop problem use may be a predictive interoceptive biomarker. However, future investigations will need to determine whether the combination of probing pleasant interoception using neuroimaging is sufficiently sensitive and specific to help identify individuals at high risk for future problem use.

Citing Articles

Interoception Within the Context of Impulsivity and Addiction.

Herman A Curr Addict Rep. 2023; 10(2):97-106.

PMID: 37266189 PMC: 10148627. DOI: 10.1007/s40429-023-00482-7.


Causal Relationship between Physiological and Pathological Processes in the Brain and in the Gastrointestinal Tract: The Brain-Intestine Axis.

Reutov V, Sorokina E Biophysics (Oxf). 2023; 67(6):972-986.

PMID: 36883179 PMC: 9984134. DOI: 10.1134/S0006350922060197.


Mindfulness-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Aberrant Interoceptive Processing in Substance Use Disorders.

May A, Davis C, Kirlic N, Stewart J Brain Sci. 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35204042 PMC: 8870441. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020279.


Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection.

Bischoff-Grethe A, Ellis R, Tapert S, Paulus M, Grant I, Translational Methamphetamine Aids Research Center Tmarc Viruses. 2021; 13(12).

PMID: 34960745 PMC: 8705776. DOI: 10.3390/v13122476.


Low-dose alcohol: Interoceptive and molecular effects and the role of dentate gyrus in rats.

Randall P, Lovelock D, VanVoorhies K, Agan V, Kash T, Besheer J Addict Biol. 2020; 26(3):e12965.

PMID: 33015936 PMC: 8019682. DOI: 10.1111/adb.12965.


References
1.
Ebisch S, Ferri F, Salone A, Perrucci M, DAmico L, Ferro F . Differential involvement of somatosensory and interoceptive cortices during the observation of affective touch. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 23(7):1808-22. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21551. View

2.
Loken L, Wessberg J, Morrison I, McGlone F, Olausson H . Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12(5):547-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2312. View

3.
Koob G . Addiction is a Reward Deficit and Stress Surfeit Disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2013; 4:72. PMC: 3730086. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00072. View

4.
Delgado M, Nystrom L, Fissell C, Noll D, Fiez J . Tracking the hemodynamic responses to reward and punishment in the striatum. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 84(6):3072-7. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.6.3072. View

5.
Swann N, Tandon N, Canolty R, Ellmore T, McEvoy L, Dreyer S . Intracranial EEG reveals a time- and frequency-specific role for the right inferior frontal gyrus and primary motor cortex in stopping initiated responses. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(40):12675-85. PMC: 2801605. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3359-09.2009. View