» Articles » PMID: 20673916

Evidence for Subtle Verbal Fluency Deficits in Occasional Stimulant Users: Quick to Play Loose with Verbal Rules

Overview
Journal J Psychiatr Res
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2010 Aug 3
PMID 20673916
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Psychostimulants like cocaine and amphetamine are commonly abused by young adults who often state that they take these drugs to increase social or cognitive performance. The current study tested the hypothesis that individuals at early stages of occasional stimulant use show subtle executive dysfunctions such as verbal fluency deficits. 155 young (age 18-25), non-dependent occasional users of stimulants and 49 stimulant naïve comparison subjects performed the Delis-Kaplan Verbal Fluency test. Correlation and median split analyses were conducted to account for stimulant history and co-drug use. Compared to stimulant naïve subjects, occasional stimulant users generated significantly more responses on an over-learned verbal fluency task (Category Fluency), but at the expense of increased error rates (Set Loss and Repetition Errors). These performance differences were not related to lifetime uses of stimulants or marijuana. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that individuals who are using stimulants occasionally exhibit subtle executive dysfunctions when required to generate verbal sets under time pressure. In particular, occasional stimulant users apply quickly but inaccurately verbal rules, which may represent a mix of diminished cognitive flexibility along with increased rigidity and impulsivity. This specific executive dysfunction may help to identify individuals at risk for stimulant use or dependence.

Citing Articles

Using word-picture verification to inform language impairment locus in chronic post-stroke aphasia.

Durfee A, Harnish S Front Rehabil Sci. 2022; 3:1012588.

PMID: 36386772 PMC: 9659640. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1012588.


Neural circuitry and mechanisms of waiting impulsivity: relevance to addiction.

Dalley J, Ersche K Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019; 374(1766):20180145.

PMID: 30966923 PMC: 6335458. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0145.


Bayesian neural adjustment of inhibitory control predicts emergence of problem stimulant use.

Harle K, Stewart J, Zhang S, Tapert S, Yu A, Paulus M Brain. 2015; 138(Pt 11):3413-26.

PMID: 26336910 PMC: 4731415. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv246.


Hyperactivation to pleasant interoceptive stimuli characterizes the transition to stimulant addiction.

Stewart J, May A, Tapert S, Paulus M Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015; 154:264-70.

PMID: 26228575 PMC: 4537790. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.07.009.


Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement in Healthy Individuals: A Compensation for Cognitive Deficits or a Question of Personality?.

Maier L, Wunderli M, Vonmoos M, Rommelt A, Baumgartner M, Seifritz E PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0129805.

PMID: 26107846 PMC: 4479570. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129805.


References
1.
Li C, Huang C, Constable R, Sinha R . Gender differences in the neural correlates of response inhibition during a stop signal task. Neuroimage. 2006; 32(4):1918-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.017. View

2.
Fillmore M, Kelly T, Martin C . Effects of d-amphetamine in human models of information processing and inhibitory control. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005; 77(2):151-9. PMC: 3201830. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.07.013. View

3.
Bolla K, Rothman R, Cadet J . Dose-related neurobehavioral effects of chronic cocaine use. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1999; 11(3):361-9. DOI: 10.1176/jnp.11.3.361. View

4.
Reske M, Eidt C, Delis D, Paulus M . Nondependent stimulant users of cocaine and prescription amphetamines show verbal learning and memory deficits. Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 68(8):762-9. PMC: 2949490. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.04.021. View

5.
Marshal M, Molina B . Antisocial behaviors moderate the deviant peer pathway to substance use in children with ADHD. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006; 35(2):216-26. PMC: 2680090. DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_5. View