» Articles » PMID: 26226448

Model-Based Individualized Treatment of Chemotherapeutics: Bayesian Population Modeling and Dose Optimization

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jul 31
PMID 26226448
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP) is one of the key drugs in the treatment of many pediatric cancers, auto immune diseases and inflammatory bowel disease. 6-MP is a prodrug, converted to an active metabolite 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) through enzymatic reaction involving thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT). Pharmacogenomic variation observed in the TPMT enzyme produces a significant variation in drug response among the patient population. Despite 6-MP's widespread use and observed variation in treatment response, efforts at quantitative optimization of dose regimens for individual patients are limited. In addition, research efforts devoted on pharmacogenomics to predict clinical responses are proving far from ideal. In this work, we present a Bayesian population modeling approach to develop a pharmacological model for 6-MP metabolism in humans. In the face of scarcity of data in clinical settings, a global sensitivity analysis based model reduction approach is used to minimize the parameter space. For accurate estimation of sensitive parameters, robust optimal experimental design based on D-optimality criteria was exploited. With the patient-specific model, a model predictive control algorithm is used to optimize the dose scheduling with the objective of maintaining the 6-TGN concentration within its therapeutic window. More importantly, for the first time, we show how the incorporation of information from different levels of biological chain-of response (i.e. gene expression-enzyme phenotype-drug phenotype) plays a critical role in determining the uncertainty in predicting therapeutic target. The model and the control approach can be utilized in the clinical setting to individualize 6-MP dosing based on the patient's ability to metabolize the drug instead of the traditional standard-dose-for-all approach.

Citing Articles

Utilization of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Pharmacoepidemiological Studies: A Systematic Review on Antiarrhythmic and Glucose-Lowering Medicines.

Mohammadi Jouabadi S, Nekouei Shahraki M, Peymani P, Stricker B, Ahmadizar F Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:908538.

PMID: 35795566 PMC: 9251370. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.908538.


Development and Validation of Open-Source R Package HMCtdm for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Lee S, Song M, Lim W, Song E, Han J, Kim B Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022; 15(2).

PMID: 35215240 PMC: 8875672. DOI: 10.3390/ph15020127.


Model-Based Simulation of Maintenance Therapy of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Jost F, Zierk J, Le T, Raupach T, Rauh M, Suttorp M Front Physiol. 2020; 11:217.

PMID: 32256384 PMC: 7093595. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00217.


Prediction of leukocyte counts during paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia maintenance therapy.

Karppinen S, Lohi O, Vihola M Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):18076.

PMID: 31792398 PMC: 6889389. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54492-5.


AMIGO2, a toolbox for dynamic modeling, optimization and control in systems biology.

Balsa-Canto E, Henriques D, Gabor A, Banga J Bioinformatics. 2016; 32(21):3357-3359.

PMID: 27378288 PMC: 5079478. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw411.

References
1.
Jayachandran D, Ramkrishna U, Skiles J, Renbarger J, Ramkrishna D . Revitalizing personalized medicine: respecting biomolecular complexities beyond gene expression. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2014; 3:e110. PMC: 4011166. DOI: 10.1038/psp.2014.6. View

2.
Chessells J, Harrison G, Lilleyman J, Bailey C, Richards S . Continuing (maintenance) therapy in lymphoblastic leukaemia: lessons from MRC UKALL X. Medical Research Council Working Party in Childhood Leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1997; 98(4):945-51. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.3113127.x. View

3.
Derijks L, Gilissen L, Engels L, Bos L, Bus P, Lohman J . Pharmacokinetics of 6-mercaptopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: implications for therapy. Ther Drug Monit. 2004; 26(3):311-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007691-200406000-00016. View

4.
Lainez J, Orcun S, Pekny J, Reklaitis G, Suvannasankha A, Fausel C . Comparison of an assumption-free Bayesian approach with Optimal Sampling Schedule to a maximum a posteriori Approach for Personalizing Cyclophosphamide Dosing. Pharmacotherapy. 2013; 34(4):330-5. DOI: 10.1002/phar.1346. View

5.
Lennard L, VAN LOON J, Lilleyman J, Weinshilboum R . Thiopurine pharmacogenetics in leukemia: correlation of erythrocyte thiopurine methyltransferase activity and 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987; 41(1):18-25. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1987.4. View