» Articles » PMID: 26224591

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hepatic Steatosis: Validation in Ex Vivo Human Livers

Overview
Journal Hepatology
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2015 Jul 31
PMID 26224591
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Emerging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers of hepatic steatosis have demonstrated tremendous promise for accurate quantification of hepatic triglyceride concentration. These methods quantify the proton density fat-fraction (PDFF), which reflects the concentration of triglycerides in tissue. Previous in vivo studies have compared MRI-PDFF with histologic steatosis grading for assessment of hepatic steatosis. However, the correlation of MRI-PDFF with the underlying hepatic triglyceride content remained unknown. The aim of this ex vivo study was to validate the accuracy of MRI-PDFF as an imaging biomarker of hepatic steatosis. Using ex vivo human livers, we compared MRI-PDFF with magnetic resonance spectroscopy-PDFF (MRS-PDFF), biochemical triglyceride extraction, and histology as three independent reference standards. A secondary aim was to compare the precision of MRI-PDFF relative to biopsy for the quantification of hepatic steatosis. MRI-PDFF was prospectively performed at 1.5 Tesla in 13 explanted human livers. We performed colocalized paired evaluation of liver fat content in all nine Couinaud segments using single-voxel MRS-PDFF (n=117) and tissue wedges for biochemical triglyceride extraction (n=117), and five core biopsies performed in each segment for histologic grading (n=585). Accuracy of MRI-PDFF was assessed through linear regression with MRS-PDFF, triglyceride extraction, and histology. Intraobserver agreement, interobserver agreement, and repeatability of MRI-PDFF and histologic grading were assessed through Bland-Altman analyses. MRI-PDFF showed an excellent correlation with MRS-PDFF (r=0.984, confidence interval 0.978-0.989) and strong correlation with histology (r=0.850, confidence interval 0.791-0.894) and triglyceride extraction (r=0.871, confidence interval 0.818-0.909). Intraobserver agreement, interobserver agreement, and repeatability showed a significantly smaller variance for MRI-PDFF than for histologic steatosis grading (all P<0.001).

Conclusion: MRI-PDFF is an accurate, precise, and reader-independent noninvasive imaging biomarker of liver triglyceride content, capable of steatosis quantification over the entire liver.

Citing Articles

Optimization of regions of interest sampling strategies for proton density fat-fraction MRI of hepatic steatosis before liver transplantation in ex vivo livers.

Chen G, Tang H, Yang Y, Zhou L, Wang Q, Hu D Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):e40146.

PMID: 40028590 PMC: 11872435. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40146.


Muscle fat infiltration: a narrative review of the magnetic resonance (MR)-based evaluation methods and their clinical applications.

Assi A, Ramadan B, Karam M, Rouyer J, Mitulescu A, Campana S Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(12):9563-9588.

PMID: 39698678 PMC: 11651973. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-177.


The association between vitamin E intake and hepatic steatosis in general and obese populations.

Chen B, Han L, Chen X Nutr Metab (Lond). 2024; 21(1):57.

PMID: 39080747 PMC: 11290045. DOI: 10.1186/s12986-024-00830-y.


The impact of steatosis assessment in imaging.

Leao Filho H Radiol Bras. 2024; 57:e3.

PMID: 38993966 PMC: 11235060. DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2024.57.e3.


Diffuse and focal liver fat: advanced imaging techniques and diagnostic insights.

Miranda J, Key Wakate Teruya A, Leao Filho H, Lahan-Martins D, Tamura Sttefano Guimaraes C, de Paula Reis Guimaraes V Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(12):4437-4462.

PMID: 38896247 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04407-4.


References
1.
Soher B, Wyatt C, Reeder S, MacFall J . Noninvasive temperature mapping with MRI using chemical shift water-fat separation. Magn Reson Med. 2010; 63(5):1238-46. PMC: 2980328. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22310. View

2.
Kuhn J, Hernando D, Mensel B, Kruger P, Ittermann T, Mayerle J . Quantitative chemical shift-encoded MRI is an accurate method to quantify hepatic steatosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 39(6):1494-501. PMC: 4276715. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24289. View

3.
Meisamy S, Hines C, Hamilton G, Sirlin C, McKenzie C, Yu H . Quantification of hepatic steatosis with T1-independent, T2-corrected MR imaging with spectral modeling of fat: blinded comparison with MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2011; 258(3):767-75. PMC: 3042638. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100708. View

4.
Hines C, Frydrychowicz A, Hamilton G, Tudorascu D, Vigen K, Yu H . T(1) independent, T(2) (*) corrected chemical shift based fat-water separation with multi-peak fat spectral modeling is an accurate and precise measure of hepatic steatosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33(4):873-81. PMC: 3130738. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22514. View

5.
Hernando D, Hines C, Yu H, Reeder S . Addressing phase errors in fat-water imaging using a mixed magnitude/complex fitting method. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 67(3):638-44. PMC: 3525711. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23044. View