Best Behaviour? Ontologies and the Formal Description of Animal Behaviour

Overview

Journal Mamm Genome

Specialty Genetics

Date 2015 Jul 29

PMID 26215546

Citations 2

Authors

Georgios V Gkoutos

Robert Hoehndorf

Loukia Tsaprouni

Paul N Schofield

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The development of ontologies for describing animal behaviour has proved to be one of the most difficult of all scientific knowledge domains. Ranging from neurological processes to human emotions, the range and scope needed for such ontologies is highly challenging, but if data integration and computational tools such as automated reasoning are to be fully applied in this important area the underlying principles of these ontologies need to be better established and development needs detailed coordination. Whilst the state of scientific knowledge is always paramount in ontology and formal description framework design, this is a particular problem with neurobehavioural ontologies where our understanding of the relationship between behaviour and its underlying biophysical basis is currently in its infancy. In this commentary, we discuss some of the fundamental problems in designing and using behaviour ontologies, and present some of the best developed tools in this domain.

Citing Articles

Toward a Functional Trait Approach to Bee Ecology.

Ostwald M, Gonzalez V, Chang C, Vitale N, Lucia M, Seltmann K Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(10):e70465.

PMID: 39429800 PMC: 11487340. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70465.

A virtual library for behavioral performance in standard conditions-rodent spontaneous activity in an open field during repeated testing and after treatment with drugs or brain lesions.

Szechtman H, Dvorkin-Gheva A, Gomez-Marin A Gigascience. 2022; 11.

PMID: 36261217 PMC: 9581716. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giac092.

References

Jensen M, Cox A, Chaudhry N, Ng M, Sule D, Duncan W . The neurological disease ontology. J Biomed Semantics. 2013; 4(1):42. PMC: 4028878. DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-4-42. View

Nestler E, Hyman S . Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(10):1161-9. PMC: 3750731. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2647. View

Midford P . Ontologies for behavior. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20(18):3700-1. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth433. View

Mandillo S, Tucci V, Holter S, Meziane H, Al Banchaabouchi M, Kallnik M . Reliability, robustness, and reproducibility in mouse behavioral phenotyping: a cross-laboratory study. Physiol Genomics. 2008; 34(3):243-55. PMC: 2519962. DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90207.2008. View

Schriml L, Arze C, Nadendla S, Chang Y, Mazaitis M, Felix V . Disease Ontology: a backbone for disease semantic integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 40(Database issue):D940-6. PMC: 3245088. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr972. View

Kas M, Fernandes C, Schalkwyk L, Collier D . Genetics of behavioural domains across the neuropsychiatric spectrum; of mice and men. Mol Psychiatry. 2007; 12(4):324-30. DOI: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001979. View

Robinson P, Webber C . Phenotype ontologies and cross-species analysis for translational research. PLoS Genet. 2014; 10(4):e1004268. PMC: 3974665. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004268. View

Devor A, Bandettini P, Boas D, Bower J, Buxton R, Cohen L . The challenge of connecting the dots in the B.R.A.I.N. Neuron. 2013; 80(2):270-4. PMC: 3864648. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.008. View

Hinde R . Aggression in animals. Proc R Soc Med. 1970; 63(2):162-3. PMC: 1811259. View

10.

Belzung C, Lemoine M . Criteria of validity for animal models of psychiatric disorders: focus on anxiety disorders and depression. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2012; 1(1):9. PMC: 3384226. DOI: 10.1186/2045-5380-1-9. View

11.

Hoehndorf R, Schofield P, Gkoutos G . PhenomeNET: a whole-phenome approach to disease gene discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39(18):e119. PMC: 3185433. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr538. View

12.

Kandel E, Markram H, Matthews P, Yuste R, Koch C . Neuroscience thinks big (and collaboratively). Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013; 14(9):659-64. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3578. View

13.

Naviaux J, Schuchbauer M, Li K, Wang L, Risbrough V, Powell S . Reversal of autism-like behaviors and metabolism in adult mice with single-dose antipurinergic therapy. Transl Psychiatry. 2014; 4:e400. PMC: 4080315. DOI: 10.1038/tp.2014.33. View

14.

Bishop S, Lahvis G . The autism diagnosis in translation: shared affect in children and mouse models of ASD. Autism Res. 2011; 4(5):317-35. PMC: 3684385. DOI: 10.1002/aur.216. View

15.

Lindquist K, Wager T, Kober H, Bliss-Moreau E, Barrett L . The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review. Behav Brain Sci. 2012; 35(3):121-43. PMC: 4329228. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X11000446. View

16.

Hoehndorf R, Schofield P, Gkoutos G . Analysis of the human diseasome using phenotype similarity between common, genetic, and infectious diseases. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:10888. PMC: 4458913. DOI: 10.1038/srep10888. View

17.

de Mooij-van Malsen A, Vinkers C, Peterse D, Olivier B, Kas M . Cross-species behavioural genetics: A starting point for unravelling the neurobiology of human psychiatric disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 35(6):1383-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.10.003. View

18.

Gottesman I, Gould T . The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiatry. 2003; 160(4):636-45. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636. View

19.

Brodkin J, Frank D, Grippo R, Hausfater M, Gulinello M, Achterholt N . Validation and implementation of a novel high-throughput behavioral phenotyping instrument for mice. J Neurosci Methods. 2014; 224:48-57. PMC: 4305388. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.12.010. View

20.

Kalueff A, Gebhardt M, Stewart A, Cachat J, Brimmer M, Chawla J . Towards a comprehensive catalog of zebrafish behavior 1.0 and beyond. Zebrafish. 2013; 10(1):70-86. PMC: 3629777. DOI: 10.1089/zeb.2012.0861. View