» Articles » PMID: 26213622

Relationships Between Self-report and Cognitive Measures of Hearing Aid Outcome

Overview
Date 2015 Jul 28
PMID 26213622
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This present study examined the relationship between cognitive measures and self-report hearing aid outcome. A sentence-final word identification and recall (SWIR) test was used to investigate how hearing aid use may relate to experienced explicit cognitive processing. A visually based cognitive test battery was also administered. To measure self-report hearing aid outcome, the International Outcome Inventory - Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) were employed. Twenty-six experienced hearing aid users (mean age of 59 years) with symmetrical moderate-to-moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss were recruited. Free recall performance in the SWIR test correlated negatively with item 3 of IOI-HA, which measures residual difficulty in adverse listening situations. Cognitive abilities related to verbal information processing were correlated positively with self-reported hearing aid use and overall success. The present study showed that reported residual difficulty with hearing aid may relate to experienced explicit processing in difficult listening conditions, such that individuals with better cognitive capacity tended to report more remaining difficulty in challenging listening situations. The possibility of using cognitive measures to predict hearing aid outcome in real life should be explored in future research.

Citing Articles

Adaptation and Validation of the Perceptual Performance Test in Malayalam.

Dhrruvakumar S, Kooknoor V, ShajiKumar S, Veerabhadrappa R J Audiol Otol. 2023; 28(1):44-51.

PMID: 37953516 PMC: 10808384. DOI: 10.7874/jao.2023.00073.


Listening to speech-in-noise with hearing aids: Do the self-reported outcomes reflect the behavioral speech perception task performance?.

Erturk P, Aslan F, Turkyilmaz M Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 281(3):1139-1147.

PMID: 37632542 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08193-5.


Time-specific Components of Pupil Responses Reveal Alternations in Effort Allocation Caused by Memory Task Demands During Speech Identification in Noise.

Ksiazek P, Zekveld A, Fiedler L, Kramer S, Wendt D Trends Hear. 2023; 27:23312165231153280.

PMID: 36938784 PMC: 10028670. DOI: 10.1177/23312165231153280.


Listen Carefully protocol: an exploratory case-control study of the association between listening effort and cognitive function.

Feldman A, Patou F, Baumann M, Stockmarr A, Waldemar G, Maier A BMJ Open. 2022; 12(3):e051109.

PMID: 35264340 PMC: 8915370. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051109.


Cognitive Flexibility and Inhibition in Individuals with Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Shende S, Nguyen L, Lydon E, Husain F, Mudar R Geriatrics (Basel). 2021; 6(1).

PMID: 33807842 PMC: 8006052. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics6010022.


References
1.
Cox R, Alexander G . Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear Hear. 2001; 22(2):151-60. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200104000-00008. View

2.
Cox R, Stephens D, Kramer S . Translations of the International Outcome inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Int J Audiol. 2002; 41(1):3-26. DOI: 10.3109/14992020209101307. View

3.
Ng E, Rudner M, Lunner T, Pedersen M, Ronnberg J . Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol. 2013; 52(7):433-41. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.776181. View

4.
Jonas Brannstrom K, Wennerstrom I . Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). J Am Acad Audiol. 2010; 21(8):512-21. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.21.8.3. View

5.
Hallgren M, Larsby B, Lyxell B, Arlinger S . Speech understanding in quiet and noise, with and without hearing aids. Int J Audiol. 2005; 44(10):574-83. DOI: 10.1080/14992020500190011. View