» Articles » PMID: 26213528

Accelerometry-based Recognition of the Placement Sites of a Wearable Sensor

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2015 Jul 28
PMID 26213528
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This work describes an automatic method to recognize the position of an accelerometer worn on five different parts of the body: ankle, thigh, hip, arm and wrist from raw accelerometer data. Automatic detection of body position of a wearable sensor would enable systems that allow users to wear sensors flexibly on different body parts or permit systems that need to automatically verify sensor placement. The two-stage location detection algorithm works by first detecting time periods during which candidates are walking (regardless of where the sensor is positioned). Then, assuming that the data refer to walking, the algorithm detects the position of the sensor. Algorithms were validated on a dataset that is substantially larger than in prior work, using a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation approach. Correct walking and placement recognition were obtained for 97.4% and 91.2% of classified data windows, respectively.

Citing Articles

Automatic Body Segment and Side Recognition of an Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor during Gait.

Baniasad M, Martin R, Crevoisier X, Pichonnaz C, Becce F, Aminian K Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(7).

PMID: 37050647 PMC: 10098809. DOI: 10.3390/s23073587.


Outdoor Localization Using BLE RSSI and Accessible Pedestrian Signals for the Visually Impaired at Intersections.

Shin K, McConville R, Metatla O, Chang M, Han C, Lee J Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(1).

PMID: 35009910 PMC: 8749544. DOI: 10.3390/s22010371.


A Framework for Maternal Physical Activities and Health Monitoring Using Wearable Sensors.

Ullah F, Iqbal A, Iqbal S, Kwak D, Anwar H, Khan A Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(15).

PMID: 34372186 PMC: 8348787. DOI: 10.3390/s21154949.


Measuring Criterion Validity of Microinteraction Ecological Momentary Assessment (Micro-EMA): Exploratory Pilot Study With Physical Activity Measurement.

Ponnada A, Thapa-Chhetry B, Manjourides J, Intille S JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021; 9(3):e23391.

PMID: 33688843 PMC: 7991987. DOI: 10.2196/23391.


Recognition and Repetition Counting for Local Muscular Endurance Exercises in Exercise-Based Rehabilitation: A Comparative Study Using Artificial Intelligence Models.

Prabhu G, OConnor N, Moran K Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(17).

PMID: 32854288 PMC: 7506764. DOI: 10.3390/s20174791.


References
1.
Swartz A, Strath S, Bassett Jr D, OBrien W, King G, Ainsworth B . Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(9 Suppl):S450-6. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00003. View

2.
Mayagoitia R, Lotters J, Veltink P, Hermens H . Standing balance evaluation using a triaxial accelerometer. Gait Posture. 2002; 16(1):55-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00199-0. View

3.
Karantonis D, Narayanan M, Mathie M, Lovell N, Celler B . Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006; 10(1):156-67. DOI: 10.1109/titb.2005.856864. View

4.
Kangas M, Konttila A, Winblad I, Jamsa T . Determination of simple thresholds for accelerometry-based parameters for fall detection. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007; 2007:1367-70. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352552. View

5.
Bourke A, ODonovan K, OLaighin G . The identification of vertical velocity profiles using an inertial sensor to investigate pre-impact detection of falls. Med Eng Phys. 2008; 30(7):937-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.12.003. View