» Articles » PMID: 26197870

Finite-Element Modelling of the Response of the Gerbil Middle Ear to Sound

Overview
Date 2015 Jul 23
PMID 26197870
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present a finite-element model of the gerbil middle ear that, using a set of baseline parameters based primarily on a priori estimates from the literature, generates responses that are comparable with responses we measured in vivo using multi-point vibrometry and with those measured by other groups. We investigated the similarity of numerous features (umbo, pars-flaccida and pars-tensa displacement magnitudes, the resonance frequency and break-up frequency, etc.) in the experimental responses with corresponding ones in the model responses, as opposed to simply computing frequency-by-frequency differences between experimental and model responses. The umbo response of the model is within the range of variability seen in the experimental data in terms of the low-frequency (i.e., well below the middle-ear resonance) magnitude and phase, the main resonance frequency and magnitude, and the roll-off slope and irregularities in the response above the resonance frequency, but is somewhat high for frequencies above the resonance frequency. At low frequencies, the ossicular axis of rotation of the model appears to correspond to the anatomical axis but the behaviour is more complex at high frequencies (i.e., above the pars-tensa break-up). The behaviour of the pars tensa in the model is similar to what is observed experimentally in terms of magnitudes, phases, the break-up frequency of the spatial vibration pattern, and the bandwidths of the high-frequency response features. A sensitivity analysis showed that the parameters that have the strongest effects on the model results are the Young's modulus, thickness and density of the pars tensa; the Young's modulus of the stapedial annular ligament; and the Young's modulus and density of the malleus. Displacements of the tympanic membrane and manubrium and the low-frequency displacement of the stapes did not show large changes when the material properties of the incus, stapes, incudomallear joint, incudostapedial joint, and posterior incudal ligament were changed by ±10 % from their values in the baseline parameter set.

Citing Articles

Developing a Virtual Model of the Rhesus Macaque Inner Ear.

Matson C, Castle N, Dai C Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(11).

PMID: 39593818 PMC: 11592339. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11111158.


From Simulations to Inference: Using Machine Learning to Tune Patient-Specific Finite-Element Models of the Middle Ear Towards Objective Diagnosis.

Motallebzadeh H, Deistler M, Schonleitner F, Macke J, Puria S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39464130 PMC: 11507950. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.15.618553.


Computational model of the human cochlea with motion of the layered osseous spiral lamina.

Tubelli A, Secchia P, Nakajima H, Puria S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39229101 PMC: 11370453. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.16.608342.


Experimental Study of Needle Insertion into Gerbil Tympanic Membrane.

Mohammadi H, Ebrahimian A, Maftoon N J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024; 25(5):427-450.

PMID: 38992318 PMC: 11639447. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00953-2.


Mechanical Effects of Medical Device Attachment to Human Tympanic Membrane.

Ebrahimian A, Mohammadi H, Maftoon N J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024; 25(3):285-302.

PMID: 38561524 PMC: 11150348. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00942-5.


References
1.
Buytaert J, Salih W, Dierick M, Jacobs P, Dirckx J . Realistic 3D computer model of the gerbil middle ear, featuring accurate morphology of bone and soft tissue structures. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2011; 12(6):681-96. PMC: 3214243. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0281-4. View

2.
Agache P, Monneur C, Leveque J, de Rigal J . Mechanical properties and Young's modulus of human skin in vivo. Arch Dermatol Res. 1980; 269(3):221-32. DOI: 10.1007/BF00406415. View

3.
Sun Q, Gan R, Chang K, Dormer K . Computer-integrated finite element modeling of human middle ear. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2003; 1(2):109-22. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-002-0014-z. View

4.
Hesabgar S, Marshall H, Agrawal S, Samani A, Ladak H . Measuring the quasi-static Young's modulus of the eardrum using an indentation technique. Hear Res. 2010; 263(1-2):168-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.005. View

5.
Funnell W, Laszlo C . A critical review of experimental observations on ear-drum structure and function. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1982; 44(4):181-205. DOI: 10.1159/000275593. View