» Articles » PMID: 26188961

Optimizing Patient Treatment Decisions in an Era of Rapid Technological Advances: the Case of Hepatitis C Treatment

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2015 Jul 20
PMID 26188961
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

How long should a patient with a treatable chronic disease wait for more effective treatments before accepting the best available treatment? We develop a framework to guide optimal treatment decisions for a deteriorating chronic disease when treatment technologies are improving over time. We formulate an optimal stopping problem using a discrete-time, finite-horizon Markov decision process. The goal is to maximize a patient's quality-adjusted life expectancy. We derive structural properties of the model and analytically solve a three-period treatment decision problem. We illustrate the model with the example of treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). Chronic HCV affects 3-4 million Americans and has been historically difficult to treat, but increasingly effective treatments have been commercialized in the past few years. We show that the optimal treatment decision is more likely to be to accept currently available treatment-despite expectations for future treatment improvement-for patients who have high-risk history, who are older, or who have more comorbidities. Insights from this study can guide HCV treatment decisions for individual patients. More broadly, our model can guide treatment decisions for curable chronic diseases by finding the optimal treatment policy for individual patients in a heterogeneous population.

Citing Articles

A Promising Approach to Optimizing Sequential Treatment Decisions for Depression: Markov Decision Process.

Li F, Jorg F, Li X, Feenstra T Pharmacoeconomics. 2022; 40(11):1015-1032.

PMID: 36100825 PMC: 9550715. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01185-z.


Country versus pharmaceutical company interests for hepatitis C treatment.

Lothan R, Gutman N, Yamin D Health Care Manag Sci. 2022; 25(4):725-749.

PMID: 36001218 PMC: 9399601. DOI: 10.1007/s10729-022-09607-2.


Optimizing Implementation of Hepatitis C Birth-Cohort Screening and Treatment Strategies: Model-Based Projections.

Li Y, Huang H, Zabinsky Z, Liu S MDM Policy Pract. 2018; 2(1):2381468316686795.

PMID: 30288414 PMC: 6124932. DOI: 10.1177/2381468316686795.


A Multi-Fidelity Rollout Algorithm for Dynamic Resource Allocation in Population Disease Management.

Ho T, Liu S, Zabinsky Z Health Care Manag Sci. 2018; 22(4):727-755.

PMID: 30194509 DOI: 10.1007/s10729-018-9454-6.

References
1.
Arias E . United States life tables, 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010; 58(21):1-40. View

2.
Graff Zivin J, Neidell M . Medical technology adoption, uncertainty, and irreversibilities: is a bird in the hand really worth more than in the bush?. Health Econ. 2009; 19(2):142-53. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1455. View

3.
Alter H, Liang T . Hepatitis C: the end of the beginning and possibly the beginning of the end. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 156(4):317-8. PMC: 3480337. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-4-201202210-00014. View

4.
Liu S, Cipriano L, Holodniy M, Owens D, Goldhaber-Fiebert J . New protease inhibitors for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 156(4):279-90. PMC: 3586733. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-4-201202210-00005. View

5.
Jacobson I, McHutchison J, Dusheiko G, Di Bisceglie A, Reddy K, Bzowej N . Telaprevir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(25):2405-16. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012912. View