Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Risk-factor Guided and Birth-cohort Screening for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in the United States
Overview
Affiliations
Background: No consensus exists on screening to detect the estimated 2 million Americans unaware of their chronic hepatitis C infections. Advisory groups differ, recommending birth-cohort screening for baby boomers, screening only high-risk individuals, or no screening. We assessed one-time risk assessment and screening to identify previously undiagnosed 40-74 year-olds given newly available hepatitis C treatments.
Methods And Findings: A Markov model evaluated alternative risk-factor guided and birth-cohort screening and treatment strategies. Risk factors included drug use history, blood transfusion before 1992, and multiple sexual partners. Analyses of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provided sex-, race-, age-, and risk-factor-specific hepatitis C prevalence and mortality rates. Nine strategies combined screening (no screening, risk-factor guided screening, or birth-cohort screening) and treatment (standard therapy-peginterferon alfa and ribavirin, Interleukin-28B-guided (IL28B) triple-therapy-standard therapy plus a protease inhibitor, or universal triple therapy). Response-guided treatment depended on HCV genotype. Outcomes include discounted lifetime costs (2010 dollars) and quality adjusted life-years (QALYs). Compared to no screening, risk-factor guided and birth-cohort screening for 50 year-olds gained 0.7 to 3.5 quality adjusted life-days and cost $168 to $568 per person. Birth-cohort screening provided more benefit per dollar than risk-factor guided screening and cost $65,749 per QALY if followed by universal triple therapy compared to screening followed by IL28B-guided triple therapy. If only 10% of screen-detected, eligible patients initiate treatment at each opportunity, birth-cohort screening with universal triple therapy costs $241,100 per QALY. Assuming treatment with triple therapy, screening all individuals aged 40-64 years costs less than $100,000 per QALY.
Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of one-time birth-cohort hepatitis C screening for 40-64 year olds is comparable to other screening programs, provided that the healthcare system has sufficient capacity to deliver prompt treatment and appropriate follow-on care to many newly screen-detected individuals.
Screening for hepatitis C in an outpatient endoscopy unit.
Rai M, Lowe C, Flemming J Can Liver J. 2022; 4(3):311-316.
PMID: 35992259 PMC: 9202776. DOI: 10.3138/canlivj-2020-0038.
Kim T, Le D, Dao D, Pham T, Mize G, Phan L Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022; 27:100524.
PMID: 35846980 PMC: 9283666. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100524.
Population-Based Testing for Undiagnosed Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.
Carty P, Fawsitt C, Gillespie P, Harrington P, ONeill M, Smith S Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021; 20(2):171-183.
PMID: 34870793 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00694-w.
Krauth C, Rossol S, Ortsater G, Kautz A, Kruger K, Herder B BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19(1):1019.
PMID: 31791253 PMC: 6889318. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4524-z.
Modelling the impact of different testing strategies for HCV infection in Switzerland.
Sadeghimehr M, Bertisch B, Schaetti C, Wandeler G, Richard J, Scheidegger C J Virus Erad. 2019; 5(4):191-203.
PMID: 31754442 PMC: 6844406.