» Articles » PMID: 23533595

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Risk-factor Guided and Birth-cohort Screening for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in the United States

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Mar 28
PMID 23533595
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: No consensus exists on screening to detect the estimated 2 million Americans unaware of their chronic hepatitis C infections. Advisory groups differ, recommending birth-cohort screening for baby boomers, screening only high-risk individuals, or no screening. We assessed one-time risk assessment and screening to identify previously undiagnosed 40-74 year-olds given newly available hepatitis C treatments.

Methods And Findings: A Markov model evaluated alternative risk-factor guided and birth-cohort screening and treatment strategies. Risk factors included drug use history, blood transfusion before 1992, and multiple sexual partners. Analyses of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provided sex-, race-, age-, and risk-factor-specific hepatitis C prevalence and mortality rates. Nine strategies combined screening (no screening, risk-factor guided screening, or birth-cohort screening) and treatment (standard therapy-peginterferon alfa and ribavirin, Interleukin-28B-guided (IL28B) triple-therapy-standard therapy plus a protease inhibitor, or universal triple therapy). Response-guided treatment depended on HCV genotype. Outcomes include discounted lifetime costs (2010 dollars) and quality adjusted life-years (QALYs). Compared to no screening, risk-factor guided and birth-cohort screening for 50 year-olds gained 0.7 to 3.5 quality adjusted life-days and cost $168 to $568 per person. Birth-cohort screening provided more benefit per dollar than risk-factor guided screening and cost $65,749 per QALY if followed by universal triple therapy compared to screening followed by IL28B-guided triple therapy. If only 10% of screen-detected, eligible patients initiate treatment at each opportunity, birth-cohort screening with universal triple therapy costs $241,100 per QALY. Assuming treatment with triple therapy, screening all individuals aged 40-64 years costs less than $100,000 per QALY.

Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of one-time birth-cohort hepatitis C screening for 40-64 year olds is comparable to other screening programs, provided that the healthcare system has sufficient capacity to deliver prompt treatment and appropriate follow-on care to many newly screen-detected individuals.

Citing Articles

Screening for hepatitis C in an outpatient endoscopy unit.

Rai M, Lowe C, Flemming J Can Liver J. 2022; 4(3):311-316.

PMID: 35992259 PMC: 9202776. DOI: 10.3138/canlivj-2020-0038.


Demonstration of a population-based HCV serosurvey in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam: Establishing baseline prevalence of and continuum of care for HCV micro-elimination by 2030.

Kim T, Le D, Dao D, Pham T, Mize G, Phan L Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022; 27:100524.

PMID: 35846980 PMC: 9283666. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100524.


Population-Based Testing for Undiagnosed Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.

Carty P, Fawsitt C, Gillespie P, Harrington P, ONeill M, Smith S Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021; 20(2):171-183.

PMID: 34870793 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00694-w.


Elimination of hepatitis C virus in Germany: modelling the cost-effectiveness of HCV screening strategies.

Krauth C, Rossol S, Ortsater G, Kautz A, Kruger K, Herder B BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19(1):1019.

PMID: 31791253 PMC: 6889318. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4524-z.


Modelling the impact of different testing strategies for HCV infection in Switzerland.

Sadeghimehr M, Bertisch B, Schaetti C, Wandeler G, Richard J, Scheidegger C J Virus Erad. 2019; 5(4):191-203.

PMID: 31754442 PMC: 6844406.


References
1.
Arias E . United States life tables, 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010; 58(21):1-40. View

2.
Fischer L, Tope D, Conboy K, Hedblom B, Ronberg E, Shewmake D . Screening for hepatitis C virus in a health maintenance organization. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160(11):1665-73. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.11.1665. View

3.
Williams I, Bell B, Kuhnert W, Alter M . Incidence and transmission patterns of acute hepatitis C in the United States, 1982-2006. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(3):242-8. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.511. View

4.
Backus L, Boothroyd D, Phillips B, Belperio P, Halloran J, Mole L . A sustained virologic response reduces risk of all-cause mortality in patients with hepatitis C. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 9(6):509-516.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.004. View

5.
Jacobson I, McHutchison J, Dusheiko G, Di Bisceglie A, Reddy K, Bzowej N . Telaprevir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(25):2405-16. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012912. View