Multiple Family Groups to Reduce Child Disruptive Behavior Difficulties: Moderating Effects of Child Welfare Status on Child Outcomes
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Children who remain at home with their permanent caregivers following a child welfare (CW) involvement (e.g., investigation, out-of-home placement) manifest high rates of behavioral difficulties, which is a risk factor for further maltreatment and out-of-home placement if not treated effectively. A recently tested Multiple Family Group (MFG) service delivery model to treat youth Disruptive Behavior Disorders (DBDs) has demonstrated effectiveness in improving child behavior difficulties among hard-to-engage, socioeconomically disadvantaged families by addressing parenting skills, parent-child relationships, family communication and organization, social support, and stress. This exploratory study examines whether child behavioral outcomes for MFG differ for families with self-reported lifetime involvement in CW services compared to other families, as families with CW involvement struggle with additional stressors that can diminish treatment success. Youth (aged 7-11) and their families were assigned to MFG or services as usual (SAU) using a block comparison design. Caregivers reported on child behavior, social skills, and functional impairment. Mixed effects regression modeled multilevel outcomes across 4 assessment points (i.e., baseline, mid-test, post-test, 6-month follow-up). Among CW-involved families, MFG participants reported significantly reduced child oppositional defiant disorder symptoms at 6-month follow-up compared with SAU participants. No other differences were found in the effect of MFG treatment between CW and non-CW involved families. Findings suggest that MFG may be as effective in reducing child behavior difficulties for both CW and non-CW involved families. As a short-term, engaging, and efficient intervention, MFG may be a particularly salient service offering for families involved in the CW system.
Gopalan G, Lee K, Pisciotta C, Hooley C, Stephens T, Acri M J Emot Behav Disord. 2023; 31(3):204-218.
PMID: 37635804 PMC: 10454527. DOI: 10.1177/10634266221120532.
Family group decision-making for children at risk of abuse or neglect: A systematic review.
McGinn T, Best P, Wilson J, Chereni A, Kamndaya M, Shlonsky A Campbell Syst Rev. 2023; 16(3):e1088.
PMID: 37131917 PMC: 8356301. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1088.
Gonzalez J, Klein C, Barnett M, Schatz N, Garoosi T, Chacko A Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023; 26(2):445-458.
PMID: 36947287 PMC: 10031187. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-023-00430-x.
Acri M, Chun Y, Yin S, Msw , Fang C, Joe S Community Ment Health J. 2022; 58(8):1513-1521.
PMID: 35362804 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-022-00966-2.
Acri M, Bornheimer L, Hamovitch E, Lambert K Res Soc Work Pract. 2020; 30(1):74-83.
PMID: 32855587 PMC: 7449371. DOI: 10.1177/1049731519841439.