» Articles » PMID: 26188424

Multiple Family Groups to Reduce Child Disruptive Behavior Difficulties: Moderating Effects of Child Welfare Status on Child Outcomes

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2015 Jul 20
PMID 26188424
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Children who remain at home with their permanent caregivers following a child welfare (CW) involvement (e.g., investigation, out-of-home placement) manifest high rates of behavioral difficulties, which is a risk factor for further maltreatment and out-of-home placement if not treated effectively. A recently tested Multiple Family Group (MFG) service delivery model to treat youth Disruptive Behavior Disorders (DBDs) has demonstrated effectiveness in improving child behavior difficulties among hard-to-engage, socioeconomically disadvantaged families by addressing parenting skills, parent-child relationships, family communication and organization, social support, and stress. This exploratory study examines whether child behavioral outcomes for MFG differ for families with self-reported lifetime involvement in CW services compared to other families, as families with CW involvement struggle with additional stressors that can diminish treatment success. Youth (aged 7-11) and their families were assigned to MFG or services as usual (SAU) using a block comparison design. Caregivers reported on child behavior, social skills, and functional impairment. Mixed effects regression modeled multilevel outcomes across 4 assessment points (i.e., baseline, mid-test, post-test, 6-month follow-up). Among CW-involved families, MFG participants reported significantly reduced child oppositional defiant disorder symptoms at 6-month follow-up compared with SAU participants. No other differences were found in the effect of MFG treatment between CW and non-CW involved families. Findings suggest that MFG may be as effective in reducing child behavior difficulties for both CW and non-CW involved families. As a short-term, engaging, and efficient intervention, MFG may be a particularly salient service offering for families involved in the CW system.

Citing Articles

Implementing a Child Mental Health Intervention in Child Welfare Services: Stakeholder Perspectives on Feasibility.

Gopalan G, Lee K, Pisciotta C, Hooley C, Stephens T, Acri M J Emot Behav Disord. 2023; 31(3):204-218.

PMID: 37635804 PMC: 10454527. DOI: 10.1177/10634266221120532.


Family group decision-making for children at risk of abuse or neglect: A systematic review.

McGinn T, Best P, Wilson J, Chereni A, Kamndaya M, Shlonsky A Campbell Syst Rev. 2023; 16(3):e1088.

PMID: 37131917 PMC: 8356301. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1088.


Intervention and Implementation Characteristics to Enhance Father Engagement: A Systematic Review of Parenting Interventions.

Gonzalez J, Klein C, Barnett M, Schatz N, Garoosi T, Chacko A Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023; 26(2):445-458.

PMID: 36947287 PMC: 10031187. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-023-00430-x.


Male Caregivers and Engagement in a Family Strengthening Program for Child Disruptive Behavior Disorders.

Acri M, Chun Y, Yin S, Msw , Fang C, Joe S Community Ment Health J. 2022; 58(8):1513-1521.

PMID: 35362804 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-022-00966-2.


Outcomes Associated With Adapting a Research-Supported Treatment for Children With Behavior Disorders.

Acri M, Bornheimer L, Hamovitch E, Lambert K Res Soc Work Pract. 2020; 30(1):74-83.

PMID: 32855587 PMC: 7449371. DOI: 10.1177/1049731519841439.


References
1.
Gueorguieva R, Krystal J . Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004; 61(3):310-7. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.3.310. View

2.
Barth R . Preventing child abuse and neglect with parent training: evidence and opportunities. Future Child. 2009; 19(2):95-118. DOI: 10.1353/foc.0.0031. View

3.
Kerkorian D, McKay M, Bannon Jr W . Seeking help a second time: parents'/caregivers' characterizations of previous experiences with mental health services for their children and perceptions of barriers to future use. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006; 76(2):161-6. DOI: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.2.161. View

4.
Gopalan G, Bannon W, Dean-Assael K, Fuss A, Gardner L, LaBarbera B . Multiple family groups: an engaging intervention for child welfare-involved families. Child Welfare. 2012; 90(4):135-56. PMC: 3313081. View

5.
Chacko A, Gopalan G, Franco L, Dean-Assael K, Jackson J, Marcus S . Multiple Family Group Service Model for Children With Disruptive Behavior Disorders: Child Outcomes at Post-Treatment. J Emot Behav Disord. 2015; 23(2):67-77. PMC: 4548959. DOI: 10.1177/1063426614532690. View