» Articles » PMID: 20842273

Engaging Families into Child Mental Health Treatment: Updates and Special Considerations

Overview
Date 2010 Sep 16
PMID 20842273
Citations 130
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The current paper reviews recent findings regarding how to conceptualize engagement and factors influencing engagement, treatment attendance rates, and interventions that work.

Method: Research related to the definition of engagement, predictors of engagement and treatment termination, attendance rates, and engaging interventions are summarized as an update to the McKay and Bannon (2004) review.

Results: Despite ongoing advances in evidence-based treatments and dissemination strategies, engaging families into mental health treatment remains a serious challenge. Within the last several years, a number of technological advances and interventions have emerged to address this problem. Families with children who present disruptive behavior challenges and symptoms of trauma are considered in terms of the unique barriers they experience regarding engagement in treatment.

Conclusions: Potential solutions to increase treatment utilization and further research in this area are discussed.

Citing Articles

Evaluating access to psychosocial services for the medicaid-insured children in Georgia.

Xie Y, Harati P, Rajbhandari-Thapa J, Serban N BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):244.

PMID: 39833752 PMC: 11748264. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21374-7.


Engagement in child psychiatry department appointments: An analysis of electronic medical records in one safety-net hospital in New England, USA.

Aguilar Silvan Y, Fortuna L, Spencer A, Ng L J Health Serv Res Policy. 2025; 30(2):79-88.

PMID: 39817346 PMC: 11877985. DOI: 10.1177/13558196241311712.


The Pilot Test of a Cross-Systems Behavioral Health Treatment Referral and Linkage Intervention for Youth on Probation.

Elkington K, Robson G, Sichel C, Lee J, Wasserman G Crim Justice Behav. 2025; 50(1):22-39.

PMID: 39802177 PMC: 11720080. DOI: 10.1177/00938548221121130.


Strategic Treatment and Assessment for Youth (STAY): A Theoretically-Driven, Culturally-Tailored MBC Approach.

Arora P, Awad M, Parr K, Connors E Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024; 52(1):261-276.

PMID: 39541064 PMC: 11703679. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01419-6.


Enrollment and completion rates of a nationwide guided digital parenting program for children with disruptive behavior before and during COVID-19.

Lintula S, Sourander A, Hinkka-Yli-Salomaki S, Ristkari T, Kinnunen M, Kurki M Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024; 34(2):739-749.

PMID: 39141106 PMC: 11868137. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-024-02523-6.


References
1.
Robbins M, Liddle H, Turner C, Dakof G, Alexander J, Kogan S . Adolescent and parent therapeutic alliances as predictors of dropout in multidimensional family therapy. J Fam Psychol. 2006; 20(1):108-16. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.1.108. View

2.
McKay M, Harrison M, Gonzales J, Kim L, Quintana E . Multiple-family groups for urban children with conduct difficulties and their families. Psychiatr Serv. 2002; 53(11):1467-8. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.11.1467. View

3.
Costello E, Angold A, Burns B, Stangl D, Tweed D, Erkanli A . The Great Smoky Mountains Study of Youth. Goals, design, methods, and the prevalence of DSM-III-R disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996; 53(12):1129-36. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830120067012. View

4.
Flicker S, Turner C, Waldron H, Brody J, Ozechowski T . Ethnic background, therapeutic alliance, and treatment retention in functional family therapy with adolescents who abuse substances. J Fam Psychol. 2008; 22(1):167-70. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.167. View

5.
Hoagwood K, Green E, Kelleher K, Schoenwald S, Rolls-Reutz J, Landsverk J . Family advocacy, support and education in children's mental health: results of a national survey. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007; 35(1-2):73-83. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-007-0149-4. View