» Articles » PMID: 26182199

Genome-Wide Association Study on Male Genital Shape and Size in Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jul 17
PMID 26182199
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Male genital morphology of animals with internal fertilization and promiscuous mating systems have been one of the most diverse and rapidly evolving morphological traits. The male genital morphology in general is known to have low phenotypic and genetic variations, but the genetic basis of the male genital variation remains unclear. Drosophila melanogaster and its closely related species are morphologically very similar, but the shapes of the posterior lobe, a cuticular projection on the male genital arch are distinct from each other, representing a model system for studying the genetic basis of male genital morphology. In this study, we used highly inbred whole genome sequenced strains of D. melanogaster to perform genome wide association analysis on posterior lobe morphology. We quantified the outline shape of posterior lobes with Fourier coefficients obtained from elliptic Fourier analysis and performed principal component analysis, and posterior lobe size. The first and second principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained approximately 88% of the total variation of the posterior lobe shape. We then examined the association between the principal component scores and posterior lobe size and 1902142 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). As a result, we obtained 15, 14 and 15 SNPs for PC1, PC2 and posterior lobe size with P-values smaller than 10(-5). Based on the location of the SNPs, 13, 13 and six protein coding genes were identified as potential candidates for PC1, PC2 and posterior lobe size, respectively. In addition to the previous findings showing that the intraspecific posterior shape variation are regulated by multiple QTL with strong effects, the present study suggests that the intraspecific variation may be under polygenic regulation with a number of loci with small effects. Further studies are required for investigating whether these candidate genes are responsible for the intraspecific posterior lobe shape variation.

Citing Articles

A developmental atlas of male terminalia across twelve species of .

Urum A, Rice G, Glassford W, Yanku Y, Shklyar B, Rebeiz M Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1349275.

PMID: 38487271 PMC: 10937369. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1349275.


Genetic basis and repeatability for desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae).

Fanara J, Sassi P, Goenaga J, Hasson E Genetica. 2023; 152(1):1-9.

PMID: 38102503 DOI: 10.1007/s10709-023-00201-0.


Long-term evolution of quantitative traits in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Yassin A, Gidaszewski N, Debat V, David J Genetica. 2022; 150(6):343-353.

PMID: 36242716 DOI: 10.1007/s10709-022-00171-9.


Genomic and gene expression associations to morphology of a sexual ornament in the chicken.

Bakovic V, Hoglund A, Martin Cerezo M, Henriksen R, Wright D G3 (Bethesda). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 35801935 PMC: 9434260. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac174.


Assessing the patterns and drivers of shape complexity in the amblypygid pedipalp.

McLean C, Garwood R, Brassey C Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(15):10709-10719.

PMID: 34367607 PMC: 8328453. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7882.


References
1.
Inagaki S, Numata K, Kondo T, Tomita M, Yasuda K, Kanai A . Identification and expression analysis of putative mRNA-like non-coding RNA in Drosophila. Genes Cells. 2005; 10(12):1163-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2005.00910.x. View

2.
Liu J, Mercer J, Stam L, Gibson G, Zeng Z, Laurie C . Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics. 1996; 142(4):1129-45. PMC: 1207113. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/142.4.1129. View

3.
Zeng Z, Liu J, Stam L, Kao C, Mercer J, Laurie C . Genetic architecture of a morphological shape difference between two Drosophila species. Genetics. 2000; 154(1):299-310. PMC: 1460924. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/154.1.299. View

4.
Chatterjee S, Uppendahl L, Chowdhury M, Ip P, Siegal M . The female-specific doublesex isoform regulates pleiotropic transcription factors to pattern genital development in Drosophila. Development. 2011; 138(6):1099-109. DOI: 10.1242/dev.055731. View

5.
Tanaka K, Hopfen C, Herbert M, Schlotterer C, Stern D, Masly J . Genetic architecture and functional characterization of genes underlying the rapid diversification of male external genitalia between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. Genetics. 2015; 200(1):357-69. PMC: 4423377. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.174045. View