» Articles » PMID: 26182145

Cessation Outcomes Among Quitline Callers in Three States During a National Tobacco Education Campaign

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2015 Jul 17
PMID 26182145
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Antismoking mass media campaigns, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Tips from Former Smokers (Tips) campaign, increase the number of tobacco users calling tobacco quitlines. Few studies have investigated long-term tobacco use cessation for callers during antismoking media campaigns. Studies have suggested that callers during campaigns may be less committed to quitting and have lower quit rates. This study examines tobacco user cessation outcomes 7 months after quitline enrollment during the 2012 Tips campaign (March 19 through June 10, 2012).

Methods: We analyzed data for 715 tobacco users who enrolled in the Nebraska, North Carolina, or Texas state quitline multiple-call programs during the 2012 Tips campaign and responded to a 7-month postenrollment survey (38.5% survey response rate). We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to determine whether 7-day and 30-day point prevalence abstinence rates 7 months after enrollment were related to level of exposure to the campaign.

Results: In multivariable models, only lower nicotine dependence and higher call completion were associated with higher odds of 7-day and 30-day abstinence 7 months after enrollment. Tips campaign exposure was not associated with abstinence.

Conclusion: Once enrolled in quitline counseling, quitline callers achieved similar outcomes regardless of Tips campaign exposure levels. While the campaign did not appear to directly affect odds of tobacco abstinence through quitlines, antismoking mass media campaigns such as Tips are valuable in increasing tobacco users' exposure to quitlines and thus increasing their likelihood of making a quit attempt and eventually achieving tobacco abstinence.

Citing Articles

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.

Akter S, Rahman M, Rouyard T, Aktar S, Nsashiyi R, Nakamura R Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(12):2367-2391.

PMID: 39375543 PMC: 11659173. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7.


Telephone-Based Smoking Cessation Counseling Service: Satisfaction and Outcomes in Vietnamese Smokers.

Ngo Q, Doan L, Vu G, Phan T, Chu H, Duong A Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36611595 PMC: 9819398. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11010135.


Effectiveness of 'Mois sans tabac 2016': A French social marketing campaign against smoking.

Guignard R, Andler R, Richard J, Pasquereau A, Quatremere G, Arwidson P Tob Induc Dis. 2021; 19:60.

PMID: 34305506 PMC: 8288465. DOI: 10.18332/tid/139028.


Race differences in predictors of weight gain among a community sample of smokers enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of a multiple behavior change intervention.

Tan M, Bush T, Lovejoy J, Javitz H, Torres A, Wassum K Prev Med Rep. 2021; 21:101303.

PMID: 33489726 PMC: 7807159. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101303.


Factors Predicting Client Re-Enrollment in Tobacco Cessation Services in a State Quitline.

Nair U, Brady B, OConnor P, Bell M Prev Chronic Dis. 2018; 15:E126.

PMID: 30339773 PMC: 6198673. DOI: 10.5888/pcd15.180144.


References
1.
Mosbaek C, Austin D, Stark M, Lambert L . The association between advertising and calls to a tobacco quitline. Tob Control. 2007; 16 Suppl 1:i24-9. PMC: 2598520. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2007.020222. View

2.
Nash C, Vickerman K, Kellogg E, Zbikowski S . Utilization of a Web-based vs integrated phone/Web cessation program among 140,000 tobacco users: an evaluation across 10 free state quitlines. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(2):e36. PMC: 4342619. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3658. View

3.
Zhang L, Vickerman K, Malarcher A, Carpenter K . Changes in Quitline Caller Characteristics During a National Tobacco Education Campaign. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; 17(9):1161-6. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu271. View

4.
Carroll T, Rock B . Generating Quitline calls during Australia's National Tobacco Campaign: effects of television advertisement execution and programme placement. Tob Control. 2003; 12 Suppl 2:ii40-4. PMC: 1766114. DOI: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_2.ii40. View

5.
Heatherton T, Kozlowski L, Frecker R, Rickert W, Robinson J . Measuring the heaviness of smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Br J Addict. 1989; 84(7):791-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03059.x. View