» Articles » PMID: 18381998

Smoking-cessation Media Campaigns and Their Effectiveness Among Socioeconomically Advantaged and Disadvantaged Populations

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2008 Apr 3
PMID 18381998
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We examined whether the impact of televised smoking cessation ads differed by a population's education and income.

Methods: We used longitudinal data from the Wisconsin Behavioral Health Survey, a statewide sample of 452 adult smokers who were interviewed in 2003 to 2004 and followed up 1 year later. Logistic regression was used to assess whether baseline recall of secondhand smoke ads and "keep trying to quit" ads was associated with quit attempts and smoking abstinence at 1 year. Interaction terms were used to assess whether these associations differed by the smokers' education and income levels.

Results: Overall, neither keep-trying-to-quit nor secondhand smoke ad recall was associated with quit attempts or smoking abstinence. Keep-trying-to-quit ads were significantly more effective in promoting quit attempts among higher-versus lower-educated populations. No differences were observed for secondhand smoke ads by the smokers' education or income levels.

Conclusions: Some media campaign messages appear less effective in promoting quit attempts among less-educated populations compared with those who have more education. There is a need to develop media campaigns that are more effective with less-educated smokers.

Citing Articles

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.

Akter S, Rahman M, Rouyard T, Aktar S, Nsashiyi R, Nakamura R Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(12):2367-2391.

PMID: 39375543 PMC: 11659173. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7.


A systematic review of second-hand smoking mass media campaigns (2002-2022).

Lim C, Rutherford B, Gartner C, McClure-Thomas C, Foo S, Su F BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):693.

PMID: 38438990 PMC: 10913644. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18222-5.


Impact of the "Warning Signs Campaign" on Characteristics of Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) to Hospitals.

Redwood E, Hyun K, French J, Chew D, Kritharides L, Brieger D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(17).

PMID: 36078416 PMC: 9517920. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710700.


Anti-Smoking Media Campaigns and Disparities in Smoking Cessation in the United States, 2001-2015.

Colston D, Cho B, Thrasher J, Titus A, Xie Y, Emery S Am J Health Promot. 2021; 35(5):658-668.

PMID: 33415988 PMC: 8362818. DOI: 10.1177/0890117120985818.


Evidence and Challenges for Translation and Population Impact of the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Ackermann R, OBrien M Curr Diab Rep. 2020; 20(3):9.

PMID: 32080770 PMC: 11100316. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-020-1293-4.


References
1.
Popham W, Potter L, Bal D, Johnson M, Duerr J, Quinn V . Do anti-smoking media campaigns help smokers quit?. Public Health Rep. 1993; 108(4):510-3. PMC: 1403416. View

2.
Macaskill P, Pierce J, Simpson J, Lyle D . Mass media-led antismoking campaign can remove the education gap in quitting behavior. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82(1):96-8. PMC: 1694428. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.82.1.96. View

3.
Biener L, Nyman A . Adults' response to Massachusetts anti-tobacco television advertisements: impact of viewer and advertisement characteristics. Tob Control. 2000; 9(4):401-7. PMC: 1748390. DOI: 10.1136/tc.9.4.401. View

4.
Hopkins D, Briss P, Ricard C, Husten C, Fielding J, Alao M . Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20(2 Suppl):16-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x. View

5.
Siahpush M, Wakefield M, Spittal M, Durkin S . Antismoking television advertising and socioeconomic variations in calls to Quitline. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007; 61(4):298-301. PMC: 2652937. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.043380. View