» Articles » PMID: 26157540

Treatment Sequences and Pharmacy Costs of 2 New Therapies for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Overview
Date 2015 Jul 10
PMID 26157540
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The approval of new therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), including the oral agents abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, has altered the standard of care for patients with mCRPC. Little information exists regarding the sequences in which new therapies for mCRPC with evidence of survival benefits are used.

Objective: To describe the sequence of medication use for patients with mCRPC as observed in 3 healthcare data sets.

Methods: Three healthcare claims data sets were used to identify patients with mCRPC who had no previous use of and were newly initiating 1 of the 2 oral study drugs (ie, abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide). The index date was the first study drug claim after September 1, 2012. Patients were followed until the data cutoff or until being lost to follow-up. Descriptive statistics summarized the proportion of patients receiving 1 line of therapy versus ≥2 lines of therapy. The use of a corticosteroid and the mean monthly pharmacy costs of abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide during the follow-up period were compared between the cohorts.

Results: A total of 3525 patients with mCRPC were identified from data set 1, 499 patients from data set 2, and 1949 patients from data set 3. The first-line use of abiraterone acetate was observed in 74%, 82%, and 80% of data sets 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and the first-line use of enzalutamide was seen in 26%, 18%, and 20%, respectively, of these same populations. The concomitant use of corticosteroids was observed in patients receiving first-line abiraterone acetate and in patients receiving first-line enzalutamide in all 3 data sets. After September 2012, abiraterone acetate was the most frequently administered therapy for mCRPC among the 2 oral agents, abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide. The monthly pharmacy costs associated with abiraterone acetate were significantly lower than those associated with enzalutamide in all 3 data sets.

Conclusions: Based on the data used in this study, abiraterone acetate was more frequently administered for patients with mCRPC than enzalutamide. The concomitant use of corticosteroids was common in patients receiving first-line abiraterone acetate or first-line enzalutamide therapy. Patients receiving abiraterone acetate had significantly lower monthly pharmacy costs than patients receiving enzalutamide. These findings may facilitate the estimation of the budgetary impact of a treatment mix for population health and for managed care stakeholders.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of enzalutamide in comparison to abiraterone in treatment of metastatic prostate cancer resistant to castration in Iran.

Goudarzi Z, Lotfi F, Najafpour Z, Hafezi A, Zakaria M, Keshavarz K BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):45.

PMID: 38378521 PMC: 10877896. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01431-w.


Healthcare Costs for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Abiraterone or Enzalutamide.

Rana D, Geue C, Baillie K, Pan J, Mueller T, Laskey J Pharmacoecon Open. 2021; 6(2):303-313.

PMID: 34761368 PMC: 8864032. DOI: 10.1007/s41669-021-00307-1.


Treatment-Related Healthcare Costs of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in Germany: A Claims Data Study.

Kreis K, Horenkamp-Sonntag D, Schneider U, Zeidler J, Glaeske G, Weissbach L Pharmacoecon Open. 2020; 5(2):299-310.

PMID: 32474839 PMC: 8160066. DOI: 10.1007/s41669-020-00219-6.


Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes Between Two Alternative Sequences with Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Chung D, Kang D, Kim J, Kim D, Lee J, Hong C Cancers (Basel). 2019; 12(1).

PMID: 31861415 PMC: 7017207. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12010008.


Real-World Treatment Patterns in Patients with Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Bone Metastases.

Wen L, Valderrama A, Costantino M, Simmons S Am Health Drug Benefits. 2019; 12(3):142-149.

PMID: 31346366 PMC: 6611520.


References
1.
Vaishampayan U . Therapeutic options and multifaceted treatment paradigms in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2014; 26(3):265-73. PMC: 4238025. DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000066. View

2.
Irelli A, Bruera G, Cannita K, Palluzzi E, Gravina G, Festuccia C . Bioclinical parameters driving decision-making of subsequent lines of treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:909623. PMC: 4058260. DOI: 10.1155/2014/909623. View

3.
Kohli M, Tindall D . New developments in the medical management of prostate cancer. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010; 85(1):77-86. PMC: 2800284. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0442. View

4.
Parente P, Parnis F, Gurney H . Challenges in the sequencing of therapies for the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2014; 10(3):205-15. DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12193. View

5.
Sartor O, Gillessen S . Treatment sequencing in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Asian J Androl. 2014; 16(3):426-31. PMC: 4023372. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.126378. View