» Articles » PMID: 26156930

Measurement of Entrance Skin Dose and Calculation of Effective Dose for Common Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations in Kashan, Iran

Overview
Date 2015 Jul 10
PMID 26156930
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The knowledge of the radiation dose received by the patient during the radiological examination is essential to prevent risks of exposures. The aim of this work is to study patient doses for common diagnostic radiographic examinations in hospitals affiliated to Kashan University of Medical sciences, Iran. The results of this survey are compared with those published by some national and international values. Entrance surface dose (ESD) was measured based on the exposure parameters used for the actual examination and effective dose (ED) was calculated by use of conversion coefficients calculated by Monte Carlo methods. The mean entrance surface dose and effective dose for examinations of the chest (PA, Lat), abdomen (AP), pelvis (AP), lumbar spine (AP, Lat) and skull (AP, Lat) are 0.37, 0.99, 2.01, 1.76, 2.18, 5.36, 1.39 and 1.01 mGy, and 0.04, 0.1, 0.28, 0,28, 0.23, 0.13, 0.01 and 0.01 mSv, respectively. The ESDs and EDs reported in this study, except for examinations of the chest, are generally lower than comparable reference dose values published in the literature. On the basis of the results obtained in this study can conclude that use of newer equipment and use of the proper radiological parameter can significantly reduce the absorbed dose. It is recommended that radiological parameter in chest examinations be revised.

Citing Articles

Entrance Skin Dose (ESD) and Bucky Table Induced Backscattered Dose (BTI-BSD) in Abdominal Radiography With nanoDot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter (OSLD).

Sayed I, Roslan N, Syed W Cureus. 2023; 15(2):e34585.

PMID: 36891018 PMC: 9986971. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34585.


Feasibility of a prototype carbon nanotube enabled stationary digital chest tomosynthesis system for identification of pulmonary nodules by pulmonologists.

Burks A, Akulian J, MacRosty C, Ghosh S, Belanger A, Sakthivel M J Thorac Dis. 2022; 14(2):257-268.

PMID: 35280479 PMC: 8902128. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-1381.


Evaluation of Ameliorative Potential of Vitamins E and C on DNA Double Strand Break (DSB) in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography (CT): A Clinical Study.

Jafarpour S, Salimian M, Mohseni M, Talari H, Aliasgharzadeh A, Farhood B Int J Mol Cell Med. 2019; 7(4):226-233.

PMID: 31516882 PMC: 6709935. DOI: 10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.7.4.226.


Initial clinical evaluation of stationary digital chest tomosynthesis in adult patients with cystic fibrosis.

Gunnell E, Franceschi D, Inscoe C, Hartman A, Goralski J, Ceppe A Eur Radiol. 2018; 29(4):1665-1673.

PMID: 30255248 PMC: 6896210. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5703-9.

References
1.
. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37(2-4):1-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. View

2.
Shahbazi-Gahrouei D, Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi M . Assessment of entrance surface dose and health risk from common radiology examinations in Iran. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012; 154(3):308-13. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncs244. View

3.
Brenner D, Huda W . Effective dose: a useful concept in diagnostic radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008; 128(4):503-8. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncn056. View

4.
Shandiz M, Bahreyni Toosi M, Farsi S, Yaghobi K . Local reference dose evaluation in conventional radiography examinations in Iran. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014; 15(2):4550. PMC: 5875487. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4550. View

5.
Mettler Jr F, Huda W, Yoshizumi T, Mahesh M . Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008; 248(1):254-63. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2481071451. View