» Articles » PMID: 26151449

Genome Scan for Selection in Structured Layer Chicken Populations Exploiting Linkage Disequilibrium Information

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jul 8
PMID 26151449
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An increasing interest is being placed in the detection of genes, or genomic regions, that have been targeted by selection because identifying signatures of selection can lead to a better understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships. A common strategy for the detection of selection signatures is to compare samples from distinct populations and to search for genomic regions with outstanding genetic differentiation. The aim of this study was to detect selective signatures in layer chicken populations using a recently proposed approach, hapFLK, which exploits linkage disequilibrium information while accounting appropriately for the hierarchical structure of populations. We performed the analysis on 70 individuals from three commercial layer breeds (White Leghorn, White Rock and Rhode Island Red), genotyped for approximately 1 million SNPs. We found a total of 41 and 107 regions with outstanding differentiation or similarity using hapFLK and its single SNP counterpart FLK respectively. Annotation of selection signature regions revealed various genes and QTL corresponding to productions traits, for which layer breeds were selected. A number of the detected genes were associated with growth and carcass traits, including IGF-1R, AGRP and STAT5B. We also annotated an interesting gene associated with the dark brown feather color mutational phenotype in chickens (SOX10). We compared FST, FLK and hapFLK and demonstrated that exploiting linkage disequilibrium information and accounting for hierarchical population structure decreased the false detection rate.

Citing Articles

A genome-wide scan to identify signatures of selection in two Iranian indigenous chicken ecotypes.

Rostamzadeh Mahdabi E, Esmailizadeh A, Ayatollahi Mehrgardi A, Fozi M Genet Sel Evol. 2021; 53(1):72.

PMID: 34503452 PMC: 8428137. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-021-00664-9.


Genetic Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci for Egg Production and Egg Quality Traits in Chickens: a Review.

Goto T, Tsudzuki M J Poult Sci. 2020; 54(1):1-12.

PMID: 32908402 PMC: 7477176. DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0160121.


Detection of Selection Signatures Among Brazilian, Sri Lankan, and Egyptian Chicken Populations Under Different Environmental Conditions.

Walugembe M, Bertolini F, Dematawewa C, Reis M, Elbeltagy A, Schmidt C Front Genet. 2019; 9:737.

PMID: 30693019 PMC: 6339939. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00737.


Integrating Selection Mapping With Genetic Mapping and Functional Genomics.

Johnsson M Front Genet. 2019; 9:603.

PMID: 30619447 PMC: 6295561. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00603.


Identification of genomic regions and candidate genes for chicken meat ultimate pH by combined detection of selection signatures and QTL.

Le Bihan-Duval E, Hennequet-Antier C, Berri C, Beauclercq S, Bourin M, Boulay M BMC Genomics. 2018; 19(1):294.

PMID: 29695245 PMC: 5918591. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4690-1.


References
1.
Pritchard J, Pickrell J, Coop G . The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation. Curr Biol. 2010; 20(4):R208-15. PMC: 2994553. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.055. View

2.
Elferink M, Megens H, Vereijken A, Hu X, Crooijmans R, Groenen M . Signatures of selection in the genomes of commercial and non-commercial chicken breeds. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2):e32720. PMC: 3287981. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032720. View

3.
Smith J, Haigh J . The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974; 23(1):23-35. View

4.
Burt D . Chicken genome: current status and future opportunities. Genome Res. 2005; 15(12):1692-8. DOI: 10.1101/gr.4141805. View

5.
Jiao S, Ren H, Li Y, Zhou J, Duan C, Lu L . Differential regulation of IGF-I and IGF-II gene expression in skeletal muscle cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012; 373(1-2):107-13. DOI: 10.1007/s11010-012-1479-4. View