» Articles » PMID: 26150761

Do Patients with Long-term Side Effects of Cancer Treatment Benefit from General Practitioner Support? A Literature Review

Overview
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Date 2015 Jul 8
PMID 26150761
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Alongside specialist cancer clinics, general practitioners have an important role in cancer patients' follow-up care, yet no literature summarises the nature, extent and impact of their involvement. This paper addresses this issue through a review of the literature.

Methods: Studies were sourced from six academic databases - AustHealth (n = 202), CINAHL (n = 500), the Cochrane Library (reviews and trials; n = 200), Embase (n = 368), PHCRIS (n = 132) and PubMed/Medline (n = 410). Studies that focused on interventions designed for patients receiving follow-up care and reported cancer care provided by a general practitioner delivered alongside specialist care were reviewed.

Results: A total of 19 papers were identified as relevant for this review (3 randomised control trials; 4 cross-sectional, 5 cohort and 3 qualitative studies, and 3 systematic reviews). The reviewed studies indicated that providing general practitioner-led supportive interventions for post-treatment care of cancer patients is feasible and acceptable to patients. General practitioner involvement resulted in improved physical and psychosocial well-being of patients and continuity of care, especially for patients with concomitant health conditions.

Conclusion: Involving general practitioners in post-treatment cancer care is beneficial to patients. However, proactive initiatives that encourage and facilitate patients to consult their general practitioner about their needs or symptoms of recurrence should be considered.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of cancer survivorship education and training for primary care providers: a systematic review.

Chan R, Agbejule O, Yates P, Emery J, Jefford M, Koczwara B J Cancer Surviv. 2021; 16(2):279-302.

PMID: 33763806 PMC: 7990618. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01018-6.


The Effectiveness of Shared Care in Cancer Survivors-A Systematic Review.

Zhao Y, Brettle A, Qiu L Int J Integr Care. 2018; 18(4):2.

PMID: 30483035 PMC: 6199565. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3954.


Enhancing the Return to Work of Cancer Survivors: Development and Feasibility of the Nurse-Led eHealth Intervention Cancer@Work.

Tamminga S, van Hezel S, de Boer A, Frings-Dresen M JMIR Res Protoc. 2016; 5(2):e118.

PMID: 27286819 PMC: 4920959. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.5565.

References
1.
Mahboubi A, Lejeune C, Coriat R, Binquet C, Bouvier A, Bejean S . Which patients with colorectal cancer are followed up by general practitioners? A population-based study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2007; 16(6):535-41. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32801023a2. View

2.
Jabaaij L, van den Akker M, Schellevis F . Excess of health care use in general practice and of comorbid chronic conditions in cancer patients compared to controls. BMC Fam Pract. 2012; 13:60. PMC: 3480891. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-60. View

3.
Earle C, Neville B . Under use of necessary care among cancer survivors. Cancer. 2004; 101(8):1712-9. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20560. View

4.
Lewis R, Neal R, Hendry M, France B, Williams N, Russell D . Patients' and healthcare professionals' views of cancer follow-up: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2009; 59(564):e248-59. PMC: 2702038. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X453576. View

5.
Grunfeld E, Levine M, Julian J, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D . Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(6):848-55. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2235. View